* Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in
> > the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d.
>
> Why _on earth_ do you want to run SA with -d switch in this kind of
> situation?
>
>-d, --remove-markupRemov
Hello Derrick and others
That it was! Thank you.
Am Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 01:13:26PM -0400 Derrick 'dman' Hudson schrieb:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Martin Schweizer wrote:
> | Hello
> |
> | If I colapse threats there is always a "ÀÄ>" at the begin of the subject
> | line. Wher
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
[..]
> the number of color is certainly limited by your terminal.
> now, if you could turn your monitor by 180 degrees then we
> might be able to see what you're using... i think we need a
> good color test...
OK, I'm trying to setup a new Mutt color sche
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> feature. i just haven't found out why. ;-)
Ack. :-/
> i recall some problems about modification tims
> vs the file system. and there were patches.
> i suppose you can search through the messages
> in the bug tracking system - but.. it's Sunday.
Yeah
* Lee J. Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-18 16:01]:
> Is there a patch anywhere to increase the number of colors
> available in Mutt? I'm trying to get it to match a new
> color scheme I've just created for slrn, but just getting a
> grey/white status line is difficult. Perhaps easy if the
>
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-18 08:44]:
> What would make mutt not report that there is new mail when there is?
> Sometimes I will find that it indicates that there is
> no new mail, yet when I change to some folders, there is.
feature. i just haven't found out why. ;-)
i recall
Is there a patch anywhere to increase the number of colors
available in Mutt? I'm trying to get it to match a new color
scheme I've just created for slrn, but just getting a grey/white
status line is difficult. Perhaps easy if the whole mutt color
scheme was to be in mono but it's not.
--
Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently installed Spamassassin and have been successfully using
> it with Mutt and Procmail. So far it's doing a great job of
> catching spam, but the ocassional one does get through.
Same here! Couldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
>> This friend I had this email discussion, mentioned that his Mutt
>> was compiled on, I quote: 'SUN platform'.
>
> Heh. I bet you're just drowning in the flood of details! :-)
Hello Derrick
That it was! Thank you.
Am Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 01:13:26PM -0400 Derrick 'dman' Hudson schrieb:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Martin Schweizer wrote:
> | Hello
> |
> | If I colapse threats there is always a "ÀÄ>" at the begin of the subject
> | line. Where is this c
What would make mutt not report that there is new mail when there is?
Sometimes I will find that it indicates that there is no new mail, yet
when I change to some folders, there is.
Thanks.
-Ken
11 matches
Mail list logo