Re: alternates configuration variable -> me_too + to_chars

* Russell L. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-29 04:44]: > I do not understand the intended usage of the alternates > configuration variable. The manual says that it "affects > Mutt's idea about messages from you and addressed to you." by setting "alternates" mutt knows your email addresses -

alternates configuration variable

I do not understand the intended usage of the alternates configuration variable. The manual says that it "affects Mutt's idea about messages from you and addressed to you." RLH

Re: spam filter

Alas! Iain Truskett spake thus: > * Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29 Jul 2002 12:02]: > > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-28-02 20:46]: > [...] > > This would be better accomplished by procmail, since this is one of > > it's intended uses. Use mutt to read/respond to email. > > If one is a

Re: spam filter

* Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29 Jul 2002 12:02]: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-28-02 20:46]: [...] > This would be better accomplished by procmail, since this is one of > it's intended uses. Use mutt to read/respond to email. If one is adding to a kill file, I personally would prefe

Re: magic crystals (was: PGP getkeys)

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Patrick spake thus: > Although english is not his native language Really? Could have fooled me. --=20 Rob 'Feztaa' Park http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/ --

Re: spam filter

* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-28-02 20:46]: > Hi! > > I wonder if it is posssible to have mutt execute a command based on > spam subject lines created by spamassassin to automatically add the > corresponding email addresses to a "shared" kill file of mine? This would be better accomplis

spam filter

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! I wonder if it is posssible to have mutt execute a command based on spam subject lines created by spamassassin to automatically add the corresponding email addresses to a "shared" kill file of mine? -

Re: magic crystals (was: PGP getkeys)

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-28-02 17:25]: > * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 17:54]: > > Sven Guckes wrote: > > > what exactly did you do at all? > > > and why is your Reply-To: line a copy of the From: line? > > > and would you consider upgrading to mutt 1.4 before > > > a

Re: PGP getkeys

Hi, * Michael Berklmeir [02-07-29 00:21:28 +0200] wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > source $path_to_gpg.rc > > > > Done. > Thanks. It worked just out of the box ;-) That's what useful defaults are for... ;-) bye, Rocco

Re: magic crystals (was: PGP getkeys)

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-28-02 17:25]: > * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 17:54]: > > Sven Guckes wrote: > > > what exactly did you do at all? > > > and why is your Reply-To: line a copy of the From: line? > > > and would you consider upgrading to mutt 1.4 before > > > a

magic crystals (was: PGP getkeys)

* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 17:54]: > Sven Guckes wrote: > > what exactly did you do at all? > > and why is your Reply-To: line a copy of the From: line? > > and would you consider upgrading to mutt 1.4 before > > and fixing the "local" in your MID to a FQDN? > > And do you real

Re: PGP getkeys

* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 18:56]: > > * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 15:54]: > > > From: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Message-ID: <20020728155436.GA1989@local> > > > User-Age

Re: PGP getkeys

Hi Rocco! On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Rocco Rutte wrote: > source $path_to_gpg.rc > > Done. Thanks. It worked just out of the box ;-) Mike -- Your lucky number is 3552664958674928. Watch for it everywhere. msg29923/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP getkeys

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 the mental interface of Sven Guckes told: > * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 15:54]: > > From: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: PGP getkeys > > Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:54:36 +0200 > >

Re: PGP getkeys

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 the mental interface of Michael Tatge told: > Elimar Riesebieter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > I've configured my mutt for using gnupg. But when I define a PGP > > getkeys command, the display gets corrupted? > > > > What did I wrong? > > Don't use getkeys. Set a keyserv

Re: PGP getkeys

Sven Guckes wrote: > what exactly did you do at all? and why is your Reply-To: line a copy > of the From: line? and would you consider upgrading to mutt 1.4 > before and fixing the "local" in your MID to a FQDN? And do you really need to be such an asshole all the time? While you often have g

Re: PGP getkeys

Hi, * Michael Berklmeir [02-07-28 18:36:22 +0200] wrote: > I want do same. Is it possible, you post your PGP config > values of your mutt-config? I'm not sure i set all values > right. I only set the > pgp_sign_command="gpg -sa" > set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="gpg -e" . The official mutt releas

Re: PGP getkeys

Elimar Riesebieter schrieb am Sonntag, den 28. Juli 2002: Hi Elimar, > I've configured my mutt for using gnupg. I want do same. Is it possible, you post your PGP config values of your mutt-config? I'm not sure i set all values right. I only set the pgp_sign_command="gpg -sa" set pgp_encrypt_si

Re: PGP getkeys

* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-28 15:54]: > From: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: PGP getkeys > Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 17:54:36 +0200 > Message-ID: <20020728155436.GA1989@local> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i > > I

Re: PGP getkeys

Elimar Riesebieter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I've configured my mutt for using gnupg. But when I define a PGP > getkeys command, the display gets corrupted? > > What did I wrong? Don't use getkeys. Set a keyserver in the gnupg options file and put this line therem, too. keyserver-options a

PGP getkeys

Hi all, I've configured my mutt for using gnupg. But when I define a PGP getkeys command, the display gets corrupted? What did I wrong? Thx in advance Elimar -- Do you smell something burning or ist it me? -- msg29915/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mutt + Outbox

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 12:37:58PM -0700, Michael Maibaum wrote: > * Dave Goodrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-27 12:25]: > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 05:58:55PM +0100, Dean Richard Benson wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I am wondering if anyone has any good suggestions for how to handle the > >

Re: Executable sigfiles

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Michael Tatge wrote: [..] > You need to append a pipe at the end to the command. That tells mutt to > use the output of the script. > > set signature="~/.signatures/my_sig|" Aaah, I thought with Mutt it was strictly backticks and the pipe only came into it with dgc's patch.

Re: Executable sigfiles

Lee J. Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > For some reason, I thought Mutt was capable of executing > sigfiles or evaluting commands in backticks inside sigfiles. > Am I mistaken? Presumably this isn't possible for security > reasons? You need to append a pipe at the end to the command. That t

Executable sigfiles

For some reason, I thought Mutt was capable of executing sigfiles or evaluting commands in backticks inside sigfiles. Am I mistaken? Presumably this isn't possible for security reasons? Before anybody mentions it - I'm aware of dgc's piped format string patch; I just wonder whether I'm recalling

Problem with flea

When I use flea, it loops forever after the line Obtaining Debian-specific information... A ps says: lefevre 3783 14640 0 10:59 pts/700:00:00 /bin/sh /home/lefevre/bin/flea lefevre 3801 3783 0 11:00 pts/700:00:00 /bin/bash /usr/bin/bug -p -s dummy mutt lefevre 3826 3801 0 11: