Re: Using Maildirs, messages have 0 lines

2001-12-24 Thread Philip Mak
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, Philip Mak wrote: > Wouldn't it be relatively easy to patch mutt so that it displays bytes > instead of lines? In a Maildir, it only takes a simple stat() operation to > find the size of a message. I'm more used to seeing bytes anyway since I > come from using pine... Never

Re: Any good mbox->Maildir conversion tool?

2001-12-24 Thread Philip Mak
On Tue, 25 Dec 2001, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > [Summary: Is there a simple mbox->Maildir conversion tool that preserves > > the "Replied", "Seen", "Trashed" and old/new status of the messages?] > > --- > > Yes, use mutt itself. > > 1) mutt -f > 2) tag all > 3) tag copy/save to new maildir Nice.

Re: Any good mbox->Maildir conversion tool?

2001-12-24 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Philip Mak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > [Summary: Is there a simple mbox->Maildir conversion tool that preserves > the "Replied", "Seen", "Trashed" and old/new status of the messages?] > --- Yes, use mutt itself. 1) mutt -f 2) tag all 3) tag copy/save to new maildir All the flags will be prese

Any good mbox->Maildir conversion tool?

2001-12-24 Thread Philip Mak
[Summary: Is there a simple mbox->Maildir conversion tool that preserves the "Replied", "Seen", "Trashed" and old/new status of the messages?] --- I've looked through 3 different mbox->Maildir conversion tools (http://www.qmail.org/top.html#maildir), but none of them seem to address the problem o

Using Maildirs, messages have 0 lines

2001-12-24 Thread Philip Mak
Even in the latest (beta) version, mutt displays the size of all messages as "0" if they are in a Maildir. I looked at the FAQ and it has a workaround that uses procmail to insert a "Lines:" header, but I'm wondering if there's a less kludgy way to do this. Wouldn't it be relatively easy to patc

Re: Sending Messages Takes A Long Time

2001-12-24 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 06:24:30PM -0600, Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was speaking with someone else about this. They > asked me to run this command "mailq -v". When I > did, the machine takes about 1 to 2 minutes. > > anyone have any thoughts on that? > > Everything els

Re: Sending Messages Takes A Long Time

2001-12-24 Thread Kelly Scroggins
I was speaking with someone else about this. They asked me to run this command "mailq -v". When I did, the machine takes about 1 to 2 minutes. anyone have any thoughts on that? Everything else works fine. I don't think it's a dns thing. nlsookups are lightning fast, and I haven't had any

Re: Euro support in mutt

2001-12-24 Thread Michael Wagner
On Montag, 24. Dez. 2001 at 15:24:13, Alexander Skwar wrote: > I'm having some trouble configuring mutt 1.3.24 to correctly use/encode > the euro character in outgoing messages. > > I've set "set charset = iso-8859-15" in my .muttrc. Now, when I sent > myself a message, mutt uses utf-8 to enco

Euro support in mutt

2001-12-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hi! I'm having some trouble configuring mutt 1.3.24 to correctly use/encode the euro character in outgoing messages. I've set "set charset = iso-8859-15" in my .muttrc. Now, when I sent myself a message, mutt uses utf-8 to encode the message: Subject: Euro: =?utf-8?B?4oKs?= Mime-Version: 1.0 C