On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:33:31PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > icu-locales 1.8.1-2 (not installed)
> > locales 2.2.4-7 (installed)
>
> That one ^^ I think. That's what I have installed. I just did a
> `dpkg-reconfigure locales' and chose my preference.
I figured that was th
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 19. 2001 23:17]:
> > Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
> Which one? There are many, for different purposes. These ones might be
> relevant:
> icu-locales 1.8.1-2 (not installed)
> locales 2.2.4-7 (installed)
That on
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 giorgian spewed into the ether:
> hi all,
> i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
> haven't figured out yet.
>
> i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
> initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too muc
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:39:32PM -0500, Brian Clark (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Hi Rob,
hello.
> > Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
> > Woody.
>
> Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
Which one? There are many, for diffe
Hi Rob,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 19. 2001 21:25]:
> Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
> Woody.
Using woody, too. Make sure you have the locales package installed.
> I've set my charset to iso-8859-1, but many characters display as a ?.
Hello all, I'm having a problem with my charset in mutt 1.3.24 on Debian
Woody.
I've set my charset to iso-8859-1, but many characters display as a ?. I
had a similar problem on mandrake, but I fixed it by setting the charset
to what it is now. It's no longer working.
Any suggestions?
--
Rob '
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Thorsten Haude (dis)graced my inbox with:
> defeat the very purpose of the quote signs. Wenn ich auf einmal die
> Sprache wecheln würde, nur damit es für *mich* klarer ist was ich
> schreibe, hätten die meisten anderen ebenfalls nichts davon.
I'm a little
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:13:03PM +0200, Paulius Bulotas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I installed my locale and I'm trying to get mutt to work with
> it... but ;) there is one problem - I could not use national chars in
> subject (To and so on), because instead of them mutt produces other ascii
> c
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:44:27PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> So, perhaps you should quote the name:
>
> my_hdr From: "Christian Kjønsvik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> (I haven't tried and don't know if this works.)
It doesn't, same result, the From-field is perverted in a slightly
different
* Gregor Zattler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011218 03:44]:
> Hi Peter,
> hi mutt users,
> * Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mon 10 Dez 2001 20:04:17 GMT]:
> [...]
> > As mentioned before, grepmail can jump in because mutt works on single
> > mail boxes. Now I was curious and figured out the command for
Hi,
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-18 00:02]:
>It's a quote string! Get over it!
My thoughts exactly.
Thorsten
--
Question Authority!
Hi,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-18 13:32]:
>Hey, he said it happenned with Crosspoint, and I'd never heard of it
>until we traded some email recently. If something of which I've never
>heard can do that, surely something of which I have might have the same
>shot!
Wrong network, wrong
Hello,
today I installed my locale and I'm trying to get mutt to work with
it... but ;) there is one problem - I could not use national chars in
subject (To and so on), because instead of them mutt produces other ascii
chars (I could not type them).
My OS is FreeBSD 4.4-Release, mutt 1.3.24i com
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:02:03PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats
> > would be better.
>
> Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word
> breaks they can still
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On the other hand, maybe giving them an explicit choice of formats
> would be better.
Personally I'd multipart/alternate the Word version so even if word
breaks they can still read the message, and give a choice of not
including the word version at sig
Ooops, proof that that X-Uptime header's not entirely useless. Just
noticed I had a locked-up proftpd process that's been there for the last
4 hours :)
* Gary Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
> multipart/alternative attachments
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:21:00AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> well in the compose screen, you can attach as many documents as you
> like, and they'll show up as MIME multipart. so compose your message,
> then exit the editor and hit 'a' to attach the first document, rinse,
> lather, repeat.
>
Roman Neuhauser muttered:
> I started playing with auto_view, but stumbled upon a problem:
>
> roman@roman ~ > grep tar-gz ~/.mailcap
> application/x-tar-gz; tar tzf -;copiousoutput
[-- Attachment #2: test.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-tar-gz, Encoding: base64, Size: 325K --]
[-- Autoview
Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> Before this degenerates into a discussion of "Why would you ever want
> to do that?" and "Mail should be text/plain": The reason I want this
> is that as secretary for an organization, I need to regularly
> distribute a form to the members. The form was written as a Word
I've RTFM and haven't seen a way for mutt to send (not display)
multipart/alternative attachments. Is there an external program that
can be used with mutt to do this? I was considering using an existing
message as a template, but I thought I read where the boundary string
has to be unique and I'
On Dec 19 at 04:21PM giorgian wrote:
[...]
> now, is there a way to tell mutt to put received messages in folders
> according to some matching rules?
if you're just dealing with mailing lists, getmail will likely
suffice. you can find it at freshmeat, and it's easy-as-pie to
configure.
--
tim
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 11:37:31PM -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Question: How do I insert both addresses into the To: line, without typing
> one out the long way?
just tag them (using "t") and then say "write message" ("m") and
they magically appear in your To:
If only one appears, make sure "au
Hi,
* giorgian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-19 16:21]:
>i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
>initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
>insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
>and my .procmailrc is an awful mess, so i gav
Thus spake Gerhard Häring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What I'd like to have is a possibility to remove the spamassassin
> markup and save the message from within mutt. Removing the markup with
> a filter works with "| spamassassin -d". But how do I then save the
> filtered message? I'm using IMAP, if
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:24PM +0100, giorgian wrote:
> hi all,
> i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
> haven't figured out yet.
>
> i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
> initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too mu
* giorgian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
> initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
> insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
> and my .procmailrc is an awful mess, so i gave up.
Gibl
hi all,
i have been using mutt for three days, and there are tons of things i
haven't figured out yet.
i haven't found anything in the man pages about mail filters;
initially i decided to try procmail, but it is decisely too much
insane for me: i'm a member of at least 15 MLs (plus this one :) ),
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 15:19:11 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
> > > After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
> > > started complain
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:30:03PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
> > After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
> > started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
> > suspected he'd
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:18:34 +0100, Andreas Landmark wrote:
> After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
> started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
> suspected he'd made a mess of his .muttrc, but after taking time to
> investigate today
After I upgraded from 1.3.23 to 1.3.24 a few days ago, one of my users
started complaining that his From field was all messed up. At first I
suspected he'd made a mess of his .muttrc, but after taking time to
investigate today it seems that his .muttrc is correct.
my_hdr Christian Kjønsvik <[EMAI
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:50:14AM, Im Eunjea wrote:
>
> send-hook . 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> send-hook '~t ml@manex\.be' 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
great, thanks... i'd forget the ~t :|
>
> --
> Eunjea
---end quoted text---
binny
--
y'a un fichier de 61 mo dans /proc c'es
* Benjamin Michotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-12-19 09:12]:
> hello,
>
> I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
> mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
> manual ?
>
>
Hello Benjamin,
Wednesday, December 19, 2001, 10:12:49 AM, you wrote:
> I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
> mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
> manual ?
IMHO
hello,
I have to use different From address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all of my
mail and [EMAIL PROTECTED] to send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried a send-hook but... it doesn't work, where could I look in the
manual ?
thanks,
binny
--
y'a un fichier de 61 mo dans /proc c'est normal ?
ah non
35 matches
Mail list logo