On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:47:18PM +0800, Reed Lai wrote:
> > > Seniors,
> > >
> > > As I remember, the signature delimiter "--" in mail body is a
> > "-- "
>
> Ah... I can not understand your answer...
> I mean... my question is that the "--" is mentione
Hi all!
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Just another quetion:
> Is there a possibility to tell mutt to coose the signature randomly
> out of a directory?
I'm using sigrot (e.g. http://packages.debian.org/stable/mail/sigrot.html)
it let's you define a signature file (that means
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:44:54AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw this thread just today - must've overlooked it the first time it
> came around. The reason I'm bringing it up again is that the problem at
> hand has not been solved.
>
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 christophe <[EMAIL
> > Seniors,
> >
> > As I remember, the signature delimiter "--" in mail body is a
> "-- "
Ah... I can not understand your answer...
I mean... my question is that the "--" is mentioned in which RFC
document?
--
Reed Lai http://w3.icpdas.com/reed/ | ICPD
* Thomas Hurst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011127 15:43]:
> * Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > So the advantage of Maildir is speed, and the disadvantage is that
> > it eats inodes for breakfast?
This is my experience, yes. Another advantage is peace of mind that
you'll never again fall
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:05:30PM +0800, Reed Lai wrote:
> Seniors,
>
> As I remember, the signature delimiter "--" in mail body is a
"-- "
--
Regards
Cliff
Seniors,
As I remember, the signature delimiter "--" in mail body is a
standard from RFC, but I forget which RCF is. Anybody remembers
that please tell me.
Thanks!
--
Reed Lai http://w3.icpdas.com/reed/ | ICPDAS http://www.icpdas.com
GnuPG (DSA/ElGamal) 0x7199EAD3 Reed Lai (key #1) <[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I saw this thread just today - must've overlooked it the first time it
came around. The reason I'm bringing it up again is that the problem at
hand has not been solved.
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed
into the ether:
[-- snip --]
> > I should add, this works also f
Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > So the advantage of Maildir is speed, and the disadvantage is that
> > it eats inodes for breakfast?
>
> I was under the impression Maildir was extremely slow, just without
> locking issues, making it a good option for pop3
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% > % Mutt seems to use the values out of the Sender header and the Date
% > % header to construct the From_ line. So maybe the solution is the
% >
% > Makes sense -- if i
* Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So the advantage of Maildir is speed, and the disadvantage is that
> it eats inodes for breakfast?
I was under the impression Maildir was extremely slow, just without
locking issues, making it a good option for pop3 servers.
I do tend to leave delet
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
> % Mutt seems to use the values out of the Sender header and the Date
> % header to construct the From_ line. So maybe the solution is the
>
> Makes sense -- if it's there. I just checked another message to see and
> t
Hallo,
does anybody know, how to use these two patches (waf.save_flag and
cd.trash_folder) at the same time.
Thanks
Nicolas
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% > % It seems Gnus reads MMDF, but doesn't write it. Gnus does IMAP,
% >
% > Ahhh... It reads anything and writes only its own (well, OK, mbox);
% > urgh.
%
% Actually,
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
> % It seems Gnus reads MMDF, but doesn't write it. Gnus does IMAP,
>
> Ahhh... It reads anything and writes only its own (well, OK, mbox);
> urgh.
Actually, Gnus writes a bunch of stuff: mbox, IMAP, nnml, babyl,
MH sp
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> Dragos --
>
> ...and then Dragos_C said...
> % Sorry, but "color index brightblue white ~N" (example) has no effect for
> % highlighting mailboxes with unread messages. Another question: I wish to
>
> I don't use the bro
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 11:02:02PM +1100, David Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > is there any way to check "normal" pgp-signatures on demand like with
>
> Theres "esc P" note the capitol P, that should verify cleartext sigs.
I thought about th
On 11/27/01 11:23 AM, David Champion sat at the `puter and typed:
> On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> > are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_
On 2001.11.27, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Roessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
> are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the _first_ attachment.
Some uudecodes even choke if there's any material in the inp
Hi!
I'm using mutt 1.3.23 with multiple IMAP-SSL account (debian's patched
mutt with ssl support compiled in). I was trying to get mutt to handle
each account's INBOX like an own spoolfile, saving sent and read
messages to subfolders on the imap-server, but I can't seem to get
this working. Maybe
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% > % Hm. Gnus reads Maildir, but doesn't write it (although I think
% > % they're working on this). Maybe I can grab a development version.
% >
% > Can it write MMDF or
On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> is there any way to check "normal" pgp-signatures on demand like with
Theres "esc P" note the capitol P, that should verify cleartext sigs.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to
get more wax!!
-
David Clarke <[EM
Hi,
does someone have experience with $Subject, especially SENDING
pgp-signed mails ? For some strange reason, the pgp signature of
my pgp-signed mails doesn't get thru. I use ssmtp as it comes
with cygwin.
--
Johannes
On 2001-11-26 17:54:31 -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> From the index, '.d' causes the entire message to be piped thru
>uudecode which will try to decode all encoded attachments.
This probably depends on the particular uudecode implementation you
are using... I've seen uudecode only decode the
24 matches
Mail list logo
