This is a nice utility for printing, Dave. And some of the other suggestions
in this thread work very well, also. I think this one may potentially be
more flexible because of your use of TeX.
I added some enhancements/bugs (you decide ;) ) to your original script:
1. Added '_' as a special cha
* Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/24/01 18:03]:
> When using fetchmail how can I delete messages greater than a certain
> size (say 100,000 octets) directly on the POP3 server avoiding that
> slowdown?
Deleting them, I don't think so. But not fetching them, yes. This can be
achieved with the -l
On (24/08/01 18:03), Vittorio wrote:
> When using fetchmail how can I delete messages greater than a certain
> size (say 100,000 octets) directly on the POP3 server avoiding that
> slowdown?
in .fetchmailrc
limit 5
(or whatever)
Ailbhe
--
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/
I use mutt with fetchmail to get loads of messages from the many lists
I'm subscribed to.
Now sometimes it happens that very long (say, exceeding 1,000,000
octets), unwanted messages slow down the download of 'wanted' messages.
My question is:
When using fetchmail how can I delete messages grea
I use mutt with fetchmail to get loads of messages from the many lists
I'm subscribed to.
Now sometimes it happens that very long (say, exceeding 1,000,000
octets), unwanted messages slow down the download of 'wanted' messages.
My question is:
When using fetchmail how can I delete messages grea
On (24/08/01 10:39), Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20?
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007
Setting this worked.
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
Many thanks!
Ailbhe
--
Homepage: http://ailbhe
Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Just upgraded to Mutt 1.3.20i (2001-07-24) and still have the same
> problem.
Hmm, I wonder if it's related to this, but still affected 1.3.20?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/message/20007
-Justin
--
[ ] -- Justin R. Miller -
On (22/08/01 19:03), Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Thus spake Ailbhe Leamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > . . . mutt tells me, just below the status bar, that "PGP signature
> > could NOT be verified."
> >
> > Although it has, in fact, been verified.
> >
> > Is this a wetware error, or a Real Bug?
>
> If
On (23/08/01 14:43), Josh Huber wrote:
> I suspect that his version of libc wasn't new enough, so apt wants to
> upgrade it, pulling in a shit ton of other upgrades. should work fine
> though :)
His?
> that's what you get for running sid (or maybe woody?)
What should I run?
OK, more specific:
