Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-12 Thread Dave Murray
Drew Fisher wrote on mutt-users: > I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask. > > I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with > an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the > attachment always comes up looking like: > > Mutt seems to know about attachments

Re: outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-12 Thread Jay Rossiter / Signe
Unfortunately, the same attachment does not arrive in the same format. TNEF is the format used by Exchange. "Transfer Neutral Encapsulation Format." The product I QA for can read these, but there isn't any publicly available code that I'm aware of to decompose TNEF files. I'd

outlook 2000 attachments

2001-03-12 Thread Drew Fisher
I have a (hopefully) quick question to ask. I am running Mutt v1.3.14i and whenever I receive an email with an attachment from someone using Microsoft Outlook 2000, the attachment always comes up looking like: [-- Attachment #2 --] [-- Type: application/ms-tnef, Encoding: base64, Size: 32K --]

imap speed

2001-03-12 Thread Christoph
Hi, I got several imap folders with 1000+ emails in each. Everytime I open a folder it takes awfully long until all headers are fetched. How do I have to configure mutt so that it saves headers or even entire emails locally and then only kind of syncs these local folders with the imap folders

Re: gpg

2001-03-12 Thread Joss Winn
Thank you for answering my mail concerning gpg. I used the gpg.rc file and all was automatically resolved! cheers Joss -- http://www.josswinn.org/PGP_key.html

Re: Undigestion

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dirk Laurie proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Some mailing lists etc. are distributed in digest form, i.e. > they have some header/index stuff etc., after which the body > consists of concatenated e-mails maybe with some standard > separator. Can mutt un-digest them, i.e. can I view them > as if

Colors in Mutt

2001-03-12 Thread Olivier Billet
Hi everyone, I have the following issue using mutt: it don't display the colors even though + I run it on a xterm_color (I can see colored prompt) + I have colors settings in my .muttrc What do I have to do ? Was there any option to include during the compiling phase? Thanks in advance, Oliv

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: > yep, it's an Z class address (IPv6) allocated for Mars people and mutters. > :-D for martians? oh I see ... I thought it was only for residents of the planet Zeta Centauri in the sugsezxystsryian galaxy. -s -- Suresh Ramasubrama

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: > For sendmail I recall it to be sort of the same (smtp:) but don't > recall the actual configuration file name. Sendmail has only one config file, not several dozen :) It's a simple matter of editing sendmail.cf to put DS your.isps.smtp.

Re: virus

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Kai Blin proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Anyway, I don't think a luser would refrain opening a file called > sexygirl.jpg.vbs if a friend of his sent it and said it was a nice > picture, would he? Or the other variants of the hybris worm - F*g with dogs.scr.vbs was one (one of my collea

Undigestion

2001-03-12 Thread Dirk Laurie
Some mailing lists etc. are distributed in digest form, i.e. they have some header/index stuff etc., after which the body consists of concatenated e-mails maybe with some standard separator. Can mutt un-digest them, i.e. can I view them as if separate mails in a folder? Dirk

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Roel Vanhout
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:30:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [lame-and-lazy-request] > anyone using maildrop can share a rules file? In it's most basic setup (I only use header matching rules, that it): if([EMAIL PROTECTED]/:h) { to "./Maildir/mutt-users/" } if(/^To: [EMAIL PROT

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread teo
Hi Suresh! On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > but not on the Internet via my modem. If this sounds like your story, check > > the setup of your sendmail, specifically DNS. The number is supplied by your > > ISP in the format of 987.654.32.1 Now I'm a happy camper except for

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread teo
Hi Dave! On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Dave Murray wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:25:00PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any way to configure mutt to send mail through a non-local SMTP > > server? > > > > Yes, I've read the FAQ entry saying "this ain't mutt's job", but.. all mut

Re: virus

2001-03-12 Thread Kai Blin
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Jan Johansson wrote: > In Windows (and a few other) email attachments are dangerous for > alot or reasons. > > The icon shown is in some cases extracted from the .exe file, > which can lead to that the program is exectued when you open the > mail. Cool, I didn't know that o

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Dave Murray
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 06:35:16PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Dave Murray proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > That helped me, but it did not address the fact that I had > > no DNS setting for my ISP configured for sendmail. > > Put your ISP's DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf then

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Dave Murray proclaimed on mutt-users that: > That helped me, but it did not address the fact that I had > no DNS setting for my ISP configured for sendmail. Put your ISP's DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf then :) -s -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Dave Murray
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 11:37:12AM +, Conor Daly wrote: > Funnily enough, I'm doing exactly that:- running sendmail on a box with an > internal IP through an IP Masq box and I set it all up using > Donncha O'Caoimh's "install-sendmail" script available from http://cork.linux.ie > > That's th

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Conor Daly proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Funnily enough, I'm doing exactly that:- running sendmail on a box with an > internal IP through an IP Masq box and I set it all up using > Donncha O'Caoimh's "install-sendmail" script available from http://cork.linux.ie > That's the way to go. Doing

Re: using non-local smtp server?

2001-03-12 Thread Conor Daly
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:27:47PM +1100 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For other users in my position, namely with a machine without a hostname and/or > externally visible IP, my advice is to stay clear of sendmail/qmail and try ssmtp. Funnily enough, I'm doing exactly that:- runnin

Re: your mail

2001-03-12 Thread Mathias Gygax
On Mon, Mär 12, 2001 at 02:00:02AM -0500, Mark Spivak wrote: > What would be the .muttrc directive to disable the lame "no subject. abort? ([y]/n)" >prompt? set abort_nosubject=no beware: subjects are a netiquette topic. there's a reason because this is the default.

about subject lines : Re: your mail

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Mark Spivak proclaimed on mutt-users that: > What would be the .muttrc directive to disable the lame "no subject. abort? > ([y]/n)" prompt? set abort_nosubject=no -s (who still thinks it's lame not to use a subject line on posts to a list) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indige

Re: your mail

2001-03-12 Thread Barry Mitchelson
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 02:00:02AM -0500, Mark Spivak wrote: > > What would be the .muttrc directive to disable the lame "no subject. abort? ([y]/n)" >prompt? > from the manual : abort_nosubject Type: quadoption Default: ask-yes If set to yes, when composing messages and no subject is give

misc: OT: for jason helfman [Re: Debian, Mutt, Eterm, Ncurses]

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Hi Please fix your posting address - mail cc'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces with this error -s - Forwarded message from Unknown User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:49:02 -0800 (PST) > From: Unknown User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Debian, Mutt, Eterm,

Re: Debian, Mutt, Eterm, Ncurses

2001-03-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Jason Helfman proclaimed on mutt-users that: > This helps a bit for now... but very unreadable, or a little more > squinting then I would like. so unset all colors from your .muttrc (or export TERM=vt100, or get a mono color scheme - plenty of them at dotfiles.org). -s -- Suresh Rama

No Subject

2001-03-12 Thread Mark Spivak
What would be the .muttrc directive to disable the lame "no subject. abort? ([y]/n)" prompt?

Re: Debian, Mutt, Eterm, Ncurses

2001-03-12 Thread Jason Helfman
This helps a bit for now... but very unreadable, or a little more squinting then I would like. On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 11:31:36AM +1100, Robert Martinovic muttered: | I added the line to my .muttrc which helped with the background issue: | | color normal white default | | Robert | | On Thu,

Removing date

2001-03-12 Thread Irwan Hadi
I have a question,although this is not too related with mutt. I want to know how do I strip the Date: line from the header of messages coming to me using procmail, and after that procmail should generate a new Date: based on the date at my computer. I want to do this, because there are some user