On 2000.11.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"john slee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i've been using mutt for a while now. one thing that's always bugged me
> (well, pretty much the only thing, now that i know about mime_forward),
> is that there's no way that i can find to have a "compose"
Thomas Roessler filled my mailbox with:
>
>
> > I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
>
> What's your key ID looking like?
when I cat on this FreeBSD box, it is all garbled... nothing
readable.
-=*=-
Scott A. Davis...[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Austin, Texas USA .
+ Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Add this to the keyboard section of the MAIN file for the theme you use for
> mutt:
> [keysyms]
Thank you. This works for me. I had the idea, but not the knowledge to
do it for myself.
Kai.
--
::: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/~bond/
:::
On 2000-11-24 04:31:12 -0600, Scott Davis wrote:
> I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
What's your key ID looking like?
Hi!
I have installed Pretty Good Privacy 2.6.3i on this FreeBSD box and all
went well. I am trying to integrate it into Mutt 1.2.5i, and that seems
to go 99% ok. The problem I have is this:
I created a key for myself on this machine using 'pgp -kg'
When I go to use Mutt, send mail to myself,
On 2000-11-24 01:51:08 +, Jan- Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Why is this an option, I want to use. I don't like, when everybdy
> can see the Bcc- Header? Does this option make sense?
Since Exim - and the relevant RFC - offer two possibilities of
handling the Bcc header, it seems reasonable to give
Hi,
Nils Vogels wrote:
>> I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
>> configured in my pgp.rc is
>> #set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
>> --batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
>> which does not work.
>
>Remove
