At 12:54 AM EST on March 4 Raju K V sent off:
> hi,
>
> In the screenshot of mutt in your page, some details of email are shown
> in the staus bar. how do you do this?
Oddly enough, the format for the status bar is described in the manual under
"status _format". RTFM...
set status_format="-%r
Pete,
You're right! The Gnome terminal is a spendid answer! Part of me
wants a non-mouse based solution, I think this is the answer for me.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 10:20:51AM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote:
> john,
>
> this could be done by running mutt in the right terminal. i'll bet an
> analog
I'll add my thanks, too. The support available here has been most welcome.
Phil
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 12:00:39AM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> Just wanted to say "Thank you very much" for all the great responses in
> this thread. Not only is Mutt a great mail app, but its users are the
> gr
Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 04 Mar 2000:
> However, since you're trusting for $XXX to be unique, you might as well
> go all the way and save two processes (a shell and the cat) by saving
> the message directly:
>
> :0
> * conditions
> {
> :0
>
On Sun, 05 Mar 2000, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
> Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
> Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
>
> everytime i reply. Any idea where this comes from, and what i should
> do to avoid this behaviour?
Looks like you have a bad reply_regexp setting. If this only matche
Hi,
I have a small problem. I have noticed that mutt inserts a space in the
subject field between the 'Re:' and the actual subject everytime i reply
to someone.
In other words:
Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
becomes
Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
Subject: Re: Foobarbaz
eve
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 03:53:48AM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software
Few -- like the Linux Kernel?
> that gets full version numbers for betas, versus most conventions that
> use a next-version-number + "b" + beta-version-number. I j
Bennett Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Note to the procmail-list folks, the mutt list grew this thread that
>spawned the question, how to deliver to Maildirs safely from an old,
>musty, non-maildir-supporting procmail. Various suggestions were
>bashed back and forth, and after I read the thread
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
:Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes
:against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one
:long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug.
Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software
that get
