* Thomas Roessler [1999.12.11]:
[snip]
> > sendlib.c) a bit - depending on a suitable option (say,
> > set_envelope_from), mutt could just pass "-f" to sendmail.
[snip]
Sorry, it's off topic.
I'm on a one-user linux box and use the 'sendmail -f' to change the
'envelope-from' from my inofficial '
On 1999-12-13 14:12:23 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> As near as I can tell, PGP support was changed to be more
> flexible, so that any command that might be sent to PGP, or
> another encryption program, can be formatted and scripted using
> the command variables, instead of being hard-coded into
Alexander Dvorak t2069 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have read the notes on pgp in the doc directory, but I still wonder
> in which way the pgp (particularly the gpg) support was improoved ?
As near as I can tell, PGP support was changed to be more flexible, so
that any command that might be s
Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone else wanting additional features should use IMAP.
>
> But there lies the rub - 99% of users of MUAs DON'T HAVE THAT
> CHOICE!!! We can't just "use IMAP", the choice isn't there!
Then MAKE it happen! You are here, trying to push Mutt into confo
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 11:59:21AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> What he said, only I'd use spamcop.net because I know about it. It's not
> only about saving time; it saves you from having to parse the headers
> yourself (though you get to see what they are, if you want), it already
> knows all of t
Chris --
...and then Ralf Hildebrandt said...
% On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
%
% > frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
%
% a) Press h to display the headers
% b) Consider using a semi automatic tool like "adcomplain.pl" or "ricochet
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 05:09:52PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
>
> > I only want to edit headers when forwarding mail because my most
> > frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
> > somewhere. It's easie
Hi folks,
I have a strange problem, I use this mailbox for several different
forwarding addresses and I am wondering if I can configure Mutt to use the
original To address instead of the default.
Mutt is set to use thecivvie@(softhome.net|yifan.net...) and so if someone
sends me and email using
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 03:59:01PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I only want to edit headers when forwarding mail because my most
> frequent use of it is to forward UCE to a postmaster/abuse address
> somewhere. It's easier to set the To: address *after* the forwarded
> mail has appeared in my edi
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 10:14:48AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Chris --
>
> Excuse me if this sounnds dumb, but...
>
> ...and then Chris Green said...
> % to TRUE only when forwarding mail? I.e. I don't want to see/edit the
> % headers when I'm composing and replying to mail normally but I *do*
>
Rejo --
I don't see anything about your Cc: hook problem, though I suspect that
Cc: won't want to be unset but instead reset to "" or some such. To not
include the original email in the reply, though, just
set noinclude
(probably with a hook :-)
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
Chris --
Excuse me if this sounnds dumb, but...
...and then Chris Green said...
% to TRUE only when forwarding mail? I.e. I don't want to see/edit the
% headers when I'm composing and replying to mail normally but I *do*
% want to be able to edit the headers directly when I'm forwarding mail.
Eric --
I don't play with pushing much, so I can't tell you why your procedure
finishes properly only sometimes, but you could certainly push a
set noconfirm_create
in there as well or set up a special .muttrc for aging and use -F to
source it.
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G
Attila --
...and then Attila Csosz said...
%
% When I change to Sent-Items it works but when I change back for example my
% Inbox folder, this folder hook affects my Inbox, so this time my Inbox folder
% looks like my Sent-Items folder.
You simply need to set a default folder-hook, since hooks
I am quite happy using mutt-1.0 and gpg.
Pgp support changed between mutt-1.0 and mutt-1.1.x.
I have read the notes on pgp in the doc directory,
but I still wonder in which way the pgp (particularly
the gpg) support was improoved ?
Excuse my curiosity,
alex
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 03:46:03PM -0500, Richard Hakim wrote:
> This isn't strictly a mutt question, but...I use emacs as my editor. Do
> you know if there is a way to make it position the cursor at the first
> empty line automatically? Also is there an e-mail writing mode? Not sure
> what that
On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:54:16PM -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
> else is pushing POP3 beyond its intended design. Anyone else wanting
> additional features should use IMAP. Anyone wanting IMAP-like features
But there lies the rub - 99% of users of MUAs DON'T HAVE THAT CHOICE!!!
We can't just "use
I have the following mutt procedure (defined as a function):
age () {
mutt -f /home/eric/Mail/$1 -e 'push uT~r>1w!~F\n\;s=$1_aged\n\xq'
}
Two problems preventing the non-interactive use of the script:
1. When the mail folder $1_aged is not already in existance, then mutt
prompts whether it s
18 matches
Mail list logo
