Re: urlview patch

1999-08-19 Thread Brian Salter-Duke
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 09:57:20AM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote: > hello, > > fairlight's talking about urlview reminded me of a mod i made to > url_handler.sh > in order to get it to play nicely with ncftp. it seems that, since i have > ncftp on my machine, url_view prefers to use (and i do too f

Re: bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 1999: > > This may actually be qmail's loop detection kicking in... At least > > that's what I'd guess. > > Yes: the message comes from vinc17.org, it has automatically been > forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've bounced it to vinc17.o

Re: bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 17:31:12 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999: > > Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've > > bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get > > it. Why do

"feature patches"

1999-08-19 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Hi, folks -- I have the following feature patches now applied to my new copy of 0.95.7i and will start playing with it :-) What's the scoop with feature patches, though? I presume that the authors simply haven't updated patchlist.c to mention them -- and does anyone care? Here's how my `mutt -

Re: Regex Troubles

1999-08-19 Thread David DeSimone
Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-]+ > > color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-\?]+ > > Error in /home/heat/.muttrc, line 67: Invalid range end Mutt has its own internal parser that examines your input lines be

Re: mutt doesn't like my privileges

1999-08-19 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-19 13:01:31 -0400, sam wrote: > To be more precise, when I try to run mutt-0.95.4, it tells me > "Mutt does not like to run with privileges." I assume that means > mod privileges, so I changed privileges and nothing I tried would > allow me to run mutt. You should not have installed

Re: mutt doesn't like my privileges

1999-08-19 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Sam -- Since some time shortly before 0.95.4, and well after 0.88, all of the suid-dependent code was stripped from mutt and put into a little executable called "mutt_dotlock"; it's a lot easier for folks to debug or inspect this little chunk of code, which exists purely to lock and unlock mailbo

mutt doesn't like my privileges

1999-08-19 Thread sam
To be more precise, when I try to run mutt-0.95.4, it tells me "Mutt does not like to run with privileges." I assume that means mod privileges, so I changed privileges and nothing I tried would allow me to run mutt. I could run it as root in my single-user operation, and I could send messages OK

Re: mutt -v does not display version number in 0.95.7i - intentional?

1999-08-19 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 11:24:53AM -0400, Ken W wrote: > I just had a thought. Look at your X-Mailer header: > > X-Mailer: Mutt i > > Maybe something simply went weird in the source code? Not sure where > the version comes from for that. Did you try unpacking the source > again and rebuilding

Re: Mixed sort? :)

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Jan Peter Hecking wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Fairlight wrote: > > I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first. > > So...I'm using reverse-threads. > > > > However...What I'd -really- like is what revers

Re: -Z failures

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 04:18:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 1999-08-19 09:29:03 -0400, Fairlight wrote: > > > NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no > > new mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox. > > BUT... -Z should -not- tell me there's

Re: -Z failures

1999-08-19 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-19 09:29:03 -0400, Fairlight wrote: > NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no > new mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox. > BUT... -Z should -not- tell me there's no new mail in any of my > mailboxes when I have two freshly generated mail

Re: bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999: > Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've > bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get > it. Why do you say that the delivered-to entry for ens-lyon.fr caused > it to not

Re: bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-19 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Vincent -- ...and then Vincent Lefevre said... % % Is there a way to remove the delivered-to line when bouncing a message? From the bounce command in mutt, I don't think so. It would be a little ugly, but you could always save the message to another mailbox, edit that mailbox and remove any he

Regex Troubles

1999-08-19 Thread Nathan Cullen
I have the following line w/regex in my .muttrc to highlight URLs in my messages: color body yellow default (http|ftp)://[_a-zA-Z0-9\./~\-]+ However, when I get a url with a question mark in it, it does not work properly. I thought that the simple solution would be to add a \? to the character

urlview patch

1999-08-19 Thread Pete Toscano
hello, fairlight's talking about urlview reminded me of a mod i made to url_handler.sh in order to get it to play nicely with ncftp. it seems that, since i have ncftp on my machine, url_view prefers to use (and i do too for that matter) ncftp. well -- at least with the version of ncftp i have (

Re: -Z failures

1999-08-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999: > Only thing I can think of is that > they're created with the first message, and the only time it worked was > when I had subsequent messages? Again, comments and advice appreciated. I've had this problem for a long time. I solved it by

-Z failures

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
Been having problems with 0.95.7i. I discovered -Z last night...after defining all my mailboxes from procmail, plus ! to start with. NowI could see it saying that /var/spool/mail/fairlite had no new mail...maybe irc does something when it checks my mailbox. BUT... -Z should -not- tell me t

Re: Mixed sort? :)

1999-08-19 Thread Jan Peter Hecking
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 08:30:32AM -0400, Fairlight wrote: > I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first. > So...I'm using reverse-threads. > > However...What I'd -really- like is what reverse-threads gives me, except > where there's a thread, have it going DOWN, not

Mixed sort? :)

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
*hopeful look* I love the threading...but I like my folders presented most-recent-first. So...I'm using reverse-threads. However...What I'd -really- like is what reverse-threads gives me, except where there's a thread, have it going DOWN, not up. I know this seems contradictory, but it's real

Re: folder-hook q.

1999-08-19 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999: > set sort=threads ... > folder-hook "." set 'sort=thread' Shouldn't that be "threads"? > What I'm doing wrong ? Miss I something in documentation ? Looks just like a typo to me. Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, ak

folder-hook q.

1999-08-19 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
hi I want set up sorting to thread in all folder except =work and =outbox where I want set sorting date-received. So I have in .muttrc this: set sort=threads #give back bindigs folder-hook "." 'bind index d delete-message' folder-hook "." set 'sort=thread' folder-hook "!" 'bind index d delete-m

bounce and delivered-to line

1999-08-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Is there a way to remove the delivered-to line when bouncing a message? Here's what happened: I've received a message to my address at vinc17.org (I use the corresponding POP account at home), and I always forward a copy to my address at ens-lyon.fr (where I can read it with Mutt). As I lost the

Re: urlview ???

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 02:53:40AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > It's wrong in the manual, not the web site per se. I sent in a patch for > it a month or two ago, here it is again. Uh HUH!...That's what I get for RTFMing! :) *grin* -- Fairlight-> |||[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fai

Re: urlview ???

1999-08-19 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/urlview-0.7.tar.gz > > Jeremy? It's wrong in the manual, not the web site per se. I sent in a patch for it a month or two ago, here it is again. > > On 1999-08-19 01:47:28 -0400, Fairlight wrote: > > The ftp

Re: urlview ???

1999-08-19 Thread Fairlight
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 09:14:55AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/urlview-0.7.tar.gz Jeremy actually got me within 5min, although he forgot /pub/mutt ...but I'm not an idiot, and it was late. :) The more important thing would be to update the web page referen