On May 28, 1999, Howard Arons wrote:
...
> Any pointers to a 0.93.2i manual?
Hits head on monitor. "lists" instead of "list" eh? Well, if you're
gonna make it so complicated...
Thanks to all those who replied (and kept their tempers). Re the
suggestion to upgrade, "if it ain't broke, don't fix
Hi,
I'm considering whether or not to install Mutt on my Debian system. I
was wondering whether the ulimit bug has been fixed:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/35/35301.html
Please make sure to respond to me personally, since I haven't subscribed
to the list yet.
Thanks,
Matt
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 15:38:54 +0200, Attila Csosz wrote:
> I tried to mail me a test message with attachment( it contained a file
> test.arj ). Using mutt everythig is OK. I see in the attachment list the
> correct file name( pressing v key ). But when I fetched this mail with
> a windows based
On 1999-05-29 09:39:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Using ~b, ~h, or ~B in an fcc or fcc-save-hook will crash any
> current mutt.
Not completely correct. It's only in an fcc-save-hook.
--- .bak/hook.c Thu May 27 13:10:46 1999
+++ hook.c Sat May 29 10:14:08 1999
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
-
On 1999-05-28 18:31:37 -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> I just sent a post to mutt-dev about what seems to be a similar
> problem. It seems to core when a fcc-save-hook matches using "~h".
Using ~b, ~h, or ~B in an fcc or fcc-save-hook will crash any
current mutt.
The problem is essentially that msg_
