Am Tue, May 25, 1999 at 05:03:23PM +0300 schrieb Saku Ytti:
> For some reason if I use gvim/vim -g as my $EDITOR I always get 'Aborted
> unmodified message.' and vim -g opens on my screen with proper filename and
> it's completely empty. This works perfectly with other programs.
Same happens to m
Hello all,
I've got a question about mutt and replying with headers. I want to see the
headers, but not all of them.
What should I do?
regards,
Gerrit.
--
The Dutch Linuxgames website. De Nederlandse Linuxgames pagina.
Everything about games on Linux.Alles over spelletjes ond
Saku Ytti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For some reason if I use gvim/vim -g as my $EDITOR I always get
> 'Aborted unmodified message.' and vim -g opens on my screen with
> proper filename and it's completely empty.
Vim probably forks itself into the background, thinking that you must be
at a sh
I'm looking to do something resembling the following pseudo-code:
I have some arbitrary field, say sender (~e in mutt)
I want to say:
~e =~ /^(.*)@(.*)$/
if -d $2, then savehook becomes $2/$1.
Suggestions, or time to look at hacking in a feature?
(As soon as I can get autoconf to behave...)
-
I am having problems with mutt-0.95.4i.
I use an external query to return a list of addresses from LDAP. I then tag
each one as I want to send the message to many people.
However, the To: line seems to hit a buffer limit and doesn't get all of the
addresses.
Is there another/better way to send
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
For some reason if I use gvim/vim -g as my $EDITOR I always get 'Aborted unmodified
message.'
and vim -g opens on my screen with proper filename and it's completely empty.
This works perfectly with other programs.
--
--ytti - ::3585:0512:1378
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 12:23:11PM +0200, Thomas Roessler said:
> On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
>
> > I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> > folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> > compiling and instal
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 02:12:52PM -0500, David DeSimone said:
> G. T. Francisco, III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > After upgrading, I've lost the ability to do PGP (I'm using PGP5),
> > e.g. if I get a signed message, I just get a "sh: v: command not
> > found" message.
>
> Mutt is tryin
On 1999-05-24 13:36:47 -0500, G. T. Francisco, III wrote:
> I've just upgraded via RPM to 95.5i to take advantage of the compressed
> folders patch. I did it via RPM as I'm really not that comfortable
> compiling and installing tarballs.
Just out of curiosity: What's the source for 0.95.5 RPMs w
On 1999-05-24 19:22:19 +, Bennett Todd wrote:
> MH enjoys the advantages mentioned for Maildir that come with
> file-per-message --- applicability of Unix tools,
> performance edge for huge messages --- but without the
> locking benefit, since both the index file and the ch
11 matches
Mail list logo