Scott McDermott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What relevance does the message date have to the filename of the
> message folder? The default $index_format is:
>
> %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s
>
> And I'm trying to understand why `%b' is between those braces, when
> date would not
Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you _read_ the beginning of my post that you quoted above? I give
> another really good reason or two for at least mutt-dev to be open.
Because it's listed in the "mutt -v" output, right? Sounds reasonable
to me, but I usually assume that peopl
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 04:40:34PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> This would also be really useful, and is something I wished majordomo
> had. Alternately, how about just letting the administrator specify two
> files to read authorized users from? This might well be easier, and
> then one of
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 07:24:46PM +0100, Georg Josef Uphoff wrote:
> Is there any way to teach mutt to encrypt mail not as
> pgp/mime but als plain pgp-text. I got a lot of friends
> still using Windows and PGP5-Plugins. Some of these Plugins
> do not recognize pgp/mime (application/pgp).
> Does
On Sat, 06 Feb at 19:04 -0500, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> Personally, I think it would make the index too "technicolor" for
> comfort. Psychedelic, distracting... Heck, I coded the color index
> feature, but I dont use it myself, because of this very same reason. I
> start to get a headache from all
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 04:31:13PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 01:02:53PM -0500, Stan Ryckman wrote:
>
> > The procmail list is open (for similar reasons; the procmail man page
> > points to it), yet it only gets maybe one piece of spam per month.
> >
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 07:16:15PM -0500, Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 12:44:47PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
>
> > > Hm. Mutt's pattern language doesnt care what the sorting method is. It
> > > evaluates each message as per the criteria you specify. I gu
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 01:02:53PM -0500, Stan Ryckman wrote:
> The procmail list is open (for similar reasons; the procmail man page
> points to it), yet it only gets maybe one piece of spam per month.
> How? It only accepts posts that have the list address in the To: or Cc:
> header. Nearly
Vikas Agnihotri on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 07:04:37PM -0500:
> Personally, I think it would make the index too "technicolor" for
> comfort. Psychedelic, distracting... Heck, I coded the color index
> feature, but I dont use it myself, because of this very same reason. I
> start to get a headache from
What possible use is "filename of the original message folder" between
`%{}'? IOW, what relevance does the message date have to the filename of
the message folder? The default $index_format is:
%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s
And I'm trying to understand why `%b' is between those brace
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 05:40:04AM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This whole mailing list situation is really silly. When Michael Elkins
> > ran the lists at Harvey Mudd College, they were open, and there was
> > practically no spam. The new maintainer has admitted that the r
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 05:42:06PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:47:49PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:34:52PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ah.. so should every user get put in here? Should sendmai
Mika Fischer on Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 10:17:29PM +0100:
> > > Is there a way to do so?
> >
> > How do you mean? Did you read about 'color index ...' in the manual?
> > You can specify colors for different messages in the index using
> > Mutt's pattern-matching language.
> >
> > Is this what you m
On Sat, 06 Feb at 10:37 -0500, Vikas Agnihotri wrote:
> > Is there a way to do so?
>
> How do you mean? Did you read about 'color index ...' in the manual?
> You can specify colors for different messages in the index using
> Mutt's pattern-matching language.
>
> Is this what you mean?
I think w
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 10:42:25AM -0500, Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 04:21:50PM -0500, Ian Peters wrote:
>
> > Say I wanted to delete some old mail in a large mailbox, so I hit
> > 'T', and then ~r -1/1/99. This tags all of the messages before
> > Januar
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=aYDVKSzuImP48n7V; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Is there any way to teach mutt to encrypt mail not as
pgp/mime but als plain pgp-text. I got a lot of friends
still using Windows and PGP5-Plugins. Some of these Plugins
do not recognize pgp/mime (application/pgp).
Does anyone have an idea how to tweak mutt into encrypting and signing
mails the o
At 05:40 AM 2/6/99 -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
>> Given that there is no current reason to have mutt-* closed,
>
>Sure there is. I'm on 3 open lists (to my regret), and I get no less than
>12 pieces of spam per day from each of them. On most of them (like gnuplot),
>the content to spam ratio is pret
> This whole mailing list situation is really silly. When Michael Elkins
> ran the lists at Harvey Mudd College, they were open, and there was
> practically no spam. The new maintainer has admitted that the reason
> he closed the lists was not that there was a spam problem, but that he
> though
Is there a way to do so?
--
Scott
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 08:06:39AM +0100, Peter van Dijk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Err... no. My MTA masquerades as attic.vuurwerk.nl, like it should. Only for some
> (broken) mailinglists (like this one) I need to set my from-address to the address
> I'm subscribed under (peter-mutt goes into
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 06:46:11PM -0500, Scott McDermott wrote:
> Peter van Dijk on Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:07:01PM +0100:
> > > Sorry if this is a FAQ - just joined the world of mutt, and the
> > > archive's web site seems a bit cranky at the moment.
> > >
> > > Is there a command I can put in
22 matches
Mail list logo
