Hi,
please consider this patch that adds a boolean configuration option,
reply_prefix. When turned off, the "Re: " prefix will not be added to
the subject of a reply, unless the subject was empty.
Cheers,
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
diff -r 6928f522ac48 init.h
--- a/init
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:00:54AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2009-11-19, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> > please consider this patch that adds a boolean configuration option,
> > reply_prefix. When turned off, the "Re: " prefix will not be added to
> > the subject
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:00:54AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Perhaps a better way to handle this would be to make 'reply_prefix' a
> string option defaulting to "Re: ".
This can be done with this other patch.
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
diff -r 69
hat is expected from a MUA such as Mutt is to read mail
from spool and send with sendmail(1). Those network protocols you
mention could be considered fancy.
So, please don't do that.
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tion/mangling cause much more problems that they solve
(if any). The actual problem is the mangling and I don't think mutt
should jump through hoops in order to handle them.
Cheers,
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
iguration
variable type. However, I see no reason to omit path expansion.
Cheers,
--
Bertrand Yvain
http://www.IELO.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:29:31PM +0100, Johannes Weißl wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:42:44PM +0100, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> > mutt should use PATH_MAX instead of _POSIX_PATH_MAX, this would allow to
> > push the boundary to the actuel limit of your system.
>
> yes, I
