invert the "abort-noattach" question

2018-11-02 Thread Daan van Rossum
Dear mutt devs, The abort_noattach feature that was added in mutt 1.10 is useful but counter-intuitive. You expect a "do you wish to continue" question and automatically answer "N", which results in accidentally sending the email without attachment. I learned to be really careful with this qu

Re: invert the "abort-noattach" question

2018-11-02 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 11:58:57AM +0100, Daan van Rossum wrote: > The abort_noattach feature that was added in mutt 1.10 is useful but > counter-intuitive. You expect a "do you wish to continue" question > and automatically answer "N", which results in accidentally sending > the email without att

Re: invert the "abort-noattach" question

2018-11-02 Thread Ian Collier
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:08:30AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > With these you answer "yes" to stop: > abort_noattach > abort_nosubject > abort_unmodified > postpone The postpone question is special because both answers stop. In fact, if you quit accidentally and get asked the question "Postp

Re: invert the "abort-noattach" question

2018-11-02 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Ian Collier [11-02-18 14:20]: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:08:30AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > With these you answer "yes" to stop: > > abort_noattach > > abort_nosubject > > abort_unmodified > > postpone > > The postpone question is special because both answers stop. > In fact, if you

Re: invert the "abort-noattach" question

2018-11-02 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 02Nov2018 17:19, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Ian Collier [11-02-18 14:20]: On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:08:30AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > With these you answer "yes" to stop: > abort_noattach > abort_nosubject > abort_unmodified > postpone The postpone question is special because both