Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/03/13 00:44, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > prefix? It really makes identifying the emails outside of the flashy > luxurious filterung Unix world (i.e. on my smartphone or in the > webmailer) so much easier! This has a cost

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-13 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:57:29 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > This has a cost: it breaks DKIM. Okay, I just read up on RFC 6377. So "-1" from myself as well. ;) Thanks, Moritz P.S.: 'L' no longer works without "subscribe". :-P

version number

2018-03-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, Building mutt from master, mutt -h (or -v) display the version as currently Mutt 1.9.4+96 (f6232a25) (2018-03-03) That's somewhat unexpected and apparently in version.sh the distance from latesttag isn't quite what was thought it would be.. Nothing important, just to mention. Eike -- O

Re: version number

2018-03-13 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:18:51PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > Building mutt from master, mutt -h (or -v) display the version as > currently > > Mutt 1.9.4+96 (f6232a25) (2018-03-03) > > That's somewhat unexpected and apparently in version.sh the distance > from latesttag isn't quite what was tho