On 2016-07-29 12:35:31 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:12:48AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I think that the right solution would be to prompt the user for
> > retrying. The user should have the choice between:
> >
> > 1. Retry (default).
> > 2. Choose a different fold
First, thanks for including sidebar in the official release. I find it
invaluable and allows me to use mutt in a work environment.
I do have a couple quibbles with the default behavior and have attached
two patches to tweak it. There are no configuration options for these
patches and they soft-fai
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 05:17:04PM -0700, Omen Wild wrote:
> First, thanks for including sidebar in the official release. I find it
> invaluable and allows me to use mutt in a work environment.
Hi Omen,
mutt-1.6.2 does not have the sidebar in it. Our default branch in the
repository has the side
changeset: 6748:01541185e6f4
user: Kevin McCarthy
date: Tue Aug 02 19:18:46 2016 -0700
link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/01541185e6f4
Use the ctx->mx_ops instead of calling mx_get_ops()
With mx_open_mailbox_append() setting the ctx->mx_ops, all contexts
should have mx_ops set.
With the sidebar, buffy fixes, trash folder, and browser updates merged,
I'd like to start thinking about a 1.7 release.
There has been a good conversation about the order of sending vs fcc,
and I think the ideas proposed have merit, but I want to take some time
to play with that idea.
This would
Quoting Kevin J. McCarthy on Tue, Aug 02 18:48:
>
> The second patch doesn't match against the latest version, and I believe
> it may be that neomutt-1.6.2 didn't include the fixes in
> https://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/6f2fe8f32dab and
>https://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/ec4c113a3d2b
>f
