Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] create a dedicated structure for mx operations

2016-05-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:25:41PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Damien Riegel > # Date 1462391862 14400 > # Wed May 04 15:57:42 2016 -0400 > # Node ID eb3c1cd64366352abc9f182d7269ac24298533d0 > # Parent d18cd04e3f5a07ea6c3d0c0b624c917a0024e037 > create a dedica

Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] create a dedicated structure for mx operations

2016-05-12 Thread Damien Riegel
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:39:00AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:25:41PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Damien Riegel > > # Date 1462391862 14400 > > # Wed May 04 15:57:42 2016 -0400 > > # Node ID eb3c1cd64366352abc9f182d7269ac2

PATCH duplicate args in contrib/gpg.rc

2016-05-12 Thread Daniel Morris
Hi, I noticed (a while ago) that contib/gpg.rc has duplicated arguments '--with-fingerprint' for a couple of settings. Probably benign, but a very simple patch (hg diff -U 5) is attached. Thanks for developing a great mail client! Daniel diff -r 391492f27fef contrib/gpg.rc --- a/contrib/gpg.rc

Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] create a dedicated structure for mx operations

2016-05-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:06:26AM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > Anyway, this is just what I am used to do. If Kevin wants larger > commits or to squash them when he picks them, that's fine by me. > It is a remainer of the first version, which used probe callbacks to > find the right mx_ops to use

Re: PATCH duplicate args in contrib/gpg.rc

2016-05-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Morris wrote: > I noticed (a while ago) that contib/gpg.rc has duplicated arguments > '--with-fingerprint' for a couple of settings. Probably benign, but > a very simple patch (hg diff -U 5) is attached. Thanks for developing a > great mail client!

Re: [PATCH] change M_* symbols to MUTT_*

2016-05-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-05-09 10:13:53 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Unless there are any objections, I will push this along with the backout > of 23334e967dd7 "Create a wrapper sys_socket.h to work around Solaris > namespace issues." later today. The code is correct, but note that the patch broke indentation

Re: [PATCH] change M_* symbols to MUTT_*

2016-05-12 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-05-09 10:13:53 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > Unless there are any objections, I will push this along with the backout > > of 23334e967dd7 "Create a wrapper sys_socket.h to work around Solaris > > namespace issues." lat

mutt: 2 new changesets

2016-05-12 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6649:6356f1068fe2 user: Damien Riegel date: Thu May 12 12:41:01 2016 -0700 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/6356f1068fe2 rename mbox_close_mailbox to mx_close_mailbox_append and move it mbox_close_mailbox was used as the counterpart of mx_open_mailbox_append. To ma

Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] create a dedicated structure for mx operations

2016-05-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:47:02AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Let me take a look. I may just squash it down to a single commit. > Unless there is an actual issue, though, there's no need to re-order and > resubmit. I moved the mbox_close_mailbox() rename to the front, and squashed all the

Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] create a dedicated structure for mx operations

2016-05-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:06:26AM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:39:00AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > the series is over-fragmented. 6, 7, and 8 definitely should be > > squashed, as the first two patches make no sense whatsoever without the > > third. > > I am u

[PATCH] add open_new_msg operation to struct mx_ops

2016-05-12 Thread Damien Riegel
# HG changeset patch # User Damien Riegel # Date 1463093733 14400 # Thu May 12 18:55:33 2016 -0400 # Node ID 12fc6e961dc15b1cfea86397b40cdb565c51c581 # Parent ae203b2c56a623a3e5c2500f0e845acac554c44b add open_new_msg operation to struct mx_ops The code was already using a function pointer t

Re: [PATCH] add open_new_msg operation to struct mx_ops

2016-05-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 07:11:20PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote: > A few lines in mx_open_new_message are also reindented using spaces > instead of tabs. > that qualifies as an unrelated change in my book. style fixes should only happen on lines which are touched anyway. the rest is for a separte co