Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: | Keywords: --

Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: | Keywords: --

Re: [Mutt] #3736: [PATCH] Fix buffer underread for empty header values

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3736: [PATCH] Fix buffer underread for empty header values -+-- Reporter: Lekensteyn | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: mutt|Version: 1.5.23 Resolution:

Re: [Mutt] #3736: [PATCH] Fix buffer underread for empty header values

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3736: [PATCH] Fix buffer underread for empty header values -+-- Reporter: Lekensteyn | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: mutt|Version: 1.5.23 Resoluti

mutt: 2 new changesets

2015-02-19 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6423:70b85d8b232b user: Peter Wu date: Tue Feb 10 18:29:24 2015 +0100 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/70b85d8b232b Fix buffer underread for empty header values. (closes #3736) When a header has no value (*p == '\0' so l == 0), do not read outside the buffer but pr

Re: [Mutt] #3733: imap_check_subscribed interacts badly with account-hook

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3733: imap_check_subscribed interacts badly with account-hook -+- Reporter: Lekensteyn | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: IMAP|Version: Resolution: wo

Re: Threads uncollapse when mailbox is externally modified

2015-02-19 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Yoshiki Vazquez Baeza wrote: > I think I found the reason why this happens, there's a block of code > that uncollapses *all* the threads in the current mailbox when it is > reopened. The comments around that block of code seem to indicate that > only new emails should be uncollapsed, so I've added

Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: | Keywords: --

Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: invalid | Keywords: ---

Re: Threads uncollapse when mailbox is externally modified

2015-02-19 Thread Yoshiki Vazquez-Baeza
Hello Kevin, That makes sense, I completely misunderstood those few lines of code. What really should happen then is that all messages in every thread should be checked and if a !old message is found, then the thread it belongs to should be uncollapsed. I'm also interested in hearing what other d

Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: | Keywords: --

Re: [Mutt] #3737: sendmail variable is ignored

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3737: sendmail variable is ignored --+-- Reporter: yoshiki | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: 1.5.14 Resolution: | Keywords: --

[Mutt] #3738: no error when attempt to send multipart message encrypted / signed using PGP traditional

2015-02-19 Thread Mutt
#3738: no error when attempt to send multipart message encrypted / signed using PGP traditional +-- Reporter: wyardley| Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: