[Mutt] #3699: Enable %a for pgp_encrypt_only_command

#3699: Enable %a for pgp_encrypt_only_command +-- Reporter: rinni | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: crypto |Version: 1.5.23 Keywords: | +---

Re: [Mutt] #3698: extract-keys crash

#3698: extract-keys crash --+-- Reporter: muffins | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: crypto |Version: 1.5.23 Resolution: | Keywords: --+-

[Mutt] #3700: index send-keys (M-k) crash

#3700: index send-keys (M-k) crash -+-- Reporter: muffins | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: crypto |Version: Keywords: | -+---

Re: [Mutt] #3700: index send-keys (M-k) crash

#3700: index send-keys (M-k) crash --+-- Reporter: muffins | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: crypto |Version: Resolution: | Keywords: --+

[Mutt] Rename attachment vs rename file

Hello all, So mutt allows the user to rename an attachment, but what this does is to rename the underlying file. To me at least, this is 1) not very useful, and 2) a violation of the principle of least astonishment [1]. So I decided to have a look at the source code, to see if would be too hard t