Re: [PATCH] Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations

2010-05-06 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 22:55:46 -0500, David Champion wrote: > Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations. > > This handles mbox From_ separators and rfc822 address parsing. Ah, nice! Just when I had dug up the "un-at-" script for being able to read some mailing lists archives. Yes,

Re: [PATCH] Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations

2010-05-06 Thread Bertrand Yvain
Hi, On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:55:46PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations. This kind of substitution is not reversible in the general case. Consider for instance this e-mail address: "works at home"@some.dom.ain Address obfuscation/mangling cause

Re: [PATCH] Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations

2010-05-06 Thread David Champion
* On 06 May 2010, Bertrand Yvain wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:55:46PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > > Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations. > > This kind of substitution is not reversible in the general case. > Consider for instance this e-mail address: "works at home"@so

Re: Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations

2010-05-06 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 06May2010 11:53, David Champion wrote: | * On 06 May 2010, Bertrand Yvain wrote: | > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:55:46PM -0500, David Champion wrote: | > > Adequately read mailboxes with s/@/ at / obfuscations. | > | > This kind of substitution is not reversible in the general case. | > Consid