mutt: new changeset

2009-06-11 Thread Brendan Cully
New changeset in mutt: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/0721c3f6320d changeset: 5871:0721c3f6320d branch: HEAD tag: tip user:Rocco Rutte date:Wed Jun 10 17:44:14 2009 +0200 summary: Only print messages about CONTEXT when quiet flag not set -- Repository URL: ht

Re: imap recent

2009-06-11 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:49:45PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, June 8 at 12:21 PM, quoth Patrick Welche: > >Now I'm even more confused: mutt says after several days of not > >reading mail, mutt says: > > > >Msgs:220272 New:6 Old:710 > > > >and those refer to the 6 new messages I receiv

Re: imap recent

2009-06-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Thursday, June 11 at 01:38 PM, quoth Patrick Welche: I don't use the header cache - I would have to enable it to use it right? (off by default?) Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Yeah, you'd have to enable it. Hmm. I don't know how mutt handles new/old tracking on IMAP without the head

Re: [Mutt] #1702: mutt re-formats Return-Path: header even in full

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#1702: mutt re-formats Return-Path: header even in full header view -+-- Reporter: matthias.and...@gmx.de | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor

Re: [Mutt] #1840: full-header edit shows "illegal" header like

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#1840: full-header edit shows "illegal" header like "Return-Path" first time but drops it later -+-- Reporter: Lukasz Stelmach | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: close

Re: [Mutt] #2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates -+-- Reporter: skunk | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IM

Re: [Mutt] #2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates -+-- Reporter: skunk | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IM

Re: [Mutt] #2883: mutt gets confused when a message disappears from

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#2883: mutt gets confused when a message disappears from a maildir -+-- Reporter: myon| Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: infoneeded_new Priority: minor | Milestone:

Re: [Mutt] #3173: Mutt with gmail crashes after IMAP timeout

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#3173: Mutt with gmail crashes after IMAP timeout ---+ Reporter: cycykewl | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect| Status: infoneeded_new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Com

Re: imap recent

2009-06-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Yeah, you'd have to enable it. > Hmm. I don't know how mutt handles new/old tracking on IMAP without > the header cache, but with a mailbox that big, it's going to be well > worth your while to enable it. I think via message flags.

Checking envelope-to header for reverse_name ?

2009-06-11 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hi, I am using address extensions to separate a number of lists that I subscribe to (e.g. user-...@example.com to subscribe to the foo list and user-bar-de...@example.com to subscribe to a bar development list.) Now I'd like to use reverse_name to reply to mails that arrive via those lists. The

Re: Checking envelope-to header for reverse_name ?

2009-06-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
First... please don't start a new thread by replying to an unrelated email and then changing the subject. Your mailer (mutt, and most other mailers) will create a "References:" header that labels your message as being a response to that other thread. Many mail programs, including mutt and most

Re: Checking envelope-to header for reverse_name ?

2009-06-11 Thread Heinrich Langos
Hi Kyle, On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:39:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > First... please don't start a new thread by replying to an unrelated > email and then changing the subject. Your mailer (mutt, and most other I'm sorry about that. I use $edit_headers and usually I remove the "In-Reply-

Re: Checking envelope-to header for reverse_name ?

2009-06-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Thursday, June 11 at 11:44 PM, quoth Heinrich Langos: mailers) will create a "References:" header that labels your message as being a response to that other thread. Many mail programs, including mutt and most mailing list archive software, will then treat your message as being part of the th

Re: [Mutt] #580: mutt stores PGP passphrase insecurely

2009-06-11 Thread Mutt
#580: mutt stores PGP passphrase insecurely -+-- Reporter: Marco d'Itri | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: trivial | Milestone:

handling of change requests

2009-06-11 Thread Antonio Radici
Hi there, I'm the co-maintainer of the mutt package in Debian and we are costantly working on incorporating your changes upstream into the Debian package and, the other way roud, in notifying new bugs to you and so on. Unfortunately our bug queue is really big and we would like to reduce it, a b

Re: Checking envelope-to header for reverse_name ?

2009-06-11 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, June 11 at 11:44 PM, quoth Heinrich Langos: > >When exactly are "References:" headers added? Sorry to digres but I > >am curious if my solution of deleting the "In-Reply-To:" header is > >sufficient. It is. References are generated if and only if you leav