Re: [PATCH] Disable line wrapping for Message-ID header (try 2)

Hi, * Peter Collingbourne wrote: I am resending this patch as it seems to have been overlooked. Nope, just that nobody said something doesn't mean it got overlooked. I didn't look at the code, this is just a wild guess: what if the header you're printing already is illegal by containing a ne

Re: [Mutt] #2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates

#2935: Occasional segfault when IMAP inbox updates -+-- Reporter: skunk | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IMAP| Versio

Re: [Mutt] #3109: Improve manual for 1.6

#3109: Improve manual for 1.6 --+- Reporter: pdmef| Owner: pdmef Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6 Component: doc | Version: 1.5

Re: [Mutt] #3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch

#3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch -+-- Reporter: vegard | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IMAP| Version: 1.5

Re: [patch] fix a few little buglets in mutt HEAD

[ I hope it's okay If i'm taking this back to mutt-dev@ ] Hi, * Erik Hovland wrote: I have access to a static analysis tool. What tool? Coverity prevent: http://coverity.com/ What's the license? My employer has a big license that they let me use on free software as long as it doesn't in

Re: [Mutt] #3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch

#3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch -+-- Reporter: vegard | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IMAP| Version: 1.5

Re: [Mutt] #3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch

#3004: Mutt 1.5.17 segfaults on debian etch +--- Reporter: vegard | Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: IMAP | Vers

Re: [patch] fix a few little buglets in mutt HEAD

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > I think all 4 present committers decided against the signing into > covertity for NDA reasons, > what NDA? the only enforcable restriction is that you don't publish the scan results verbatim, but that's pretty much irrelevant, as the r

Re: [PATCH] Disable line wrapping for Message-ID header (try 2)

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:57:02AM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > what if the header > you're printing already is illegal by containing a newline like so and > is overly long: > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It hope does a sane thing now but won't with a simple fprintf() leaving > a br

Re: [Mutt] #3109: Improve manual for 1.6

#3109: Improve manual for 1.6 --+- Reporter: pdmef| Owner: pdmef Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6 Component: doc | Version: 1.5

Re: [patch] fix a few little buglets in mutt HEAD

>>> Are there usage restrictions for the >>> results? >> >> Yes, I cannot share the results. Only the patches. But you can probably >> request that coverity add mutt to scan.coverity.com > > I think all 4 present committers decided against the signing into > covertity for NDA reasons, I'm not sure

Re: [patch] fix a few little buglets in mutt HEAD

On Wednesday, 10 December 2008 at 15:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote: > > I think all 4 present committers decided against the signing into > > covertity for NDA reasons, > > > what NDA? the only enforcable restriction is that you don't p