Re: [Mutt] #3033: text_enriched_handler and UTF-8 (and charsets as

#3033: text_enriched_handler and UTF-8 (and charsets as a whole) --+- Reporter: iazz | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6 Component: cha

Re: [Mutt] #3001: format=flowed interoperability

#3001: format=flowed interoperability --+- Reporter: js | Owner: mutt-dev Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6

Re: [Mutt] #2942: header cache is still not safe

#2942: header cache is still not safe ---+ Reporter: brendan | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: header cache |

Re: [Mutt] #1668: Very irritating error ("bad IDN") when an unknown

#1668: Very irritating error ("bad IDN") when an unknown charset (eg. typo: "ise-8859-1") is specified ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect| Status: new

Re: [Mutt] #2875: group-reply with empty address group should prune

#2875: group-reply with empty address group should prune address group --+- Reporter: dgc | Owner: mutt-dev Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor| M

Re: [Mutt] #3061: display broken when a mail contains U+FEFF

#3061: display broken when a mail contains U+FEFF --+- Reporter: myon | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6 Component: display | Ver

Re: [Mutt] #3048: ZWSP at start of line causes display problems in

#3048: ZWSP at start of line causes display problems in pager --+- Reporter: heycam | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: 1.6 Component: displa

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

* Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-14 19:13 -0400]: > that we have mercurial now. What's the point of unstable > releases when it's so easy to fetch and build the tree? Maybe One point is to get more testers. I have the impression that many users just use their distro's version which is

[Mutt] #3106: "BYE System Error" from Gmail

#3106: "BYE System Error" from Gmail +--- Reporter: mvip| Owner: brendan Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: IMAP| Version: 1.4 Keywords

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

Hi, * Brendan Cully wrote: On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 at 11:28, Aron Griffis wrote: IMHO mutt should ditch the stable/devel concept and make releases similar to kernel.org. We're never going to fix all the outstanding bugs for 1.6, so we should release it *now*. Make I am also quite fr

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

Hi, * Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Wednesday, August 13 at 12:27 AM, quoth Brendan Cully: This patch makes me uneasy (especially during a freeze), but I'm willing to apply it if no one else objects. I don't see what kind of damage a hook might do in batch mode, but I can't convince myself that

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:51:58PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: > Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: [Thu Aug 14 2008, 01:05:06PM EDT] > > Why not simply use > > > > set record=imaps://your.courier.host/INBOX.Outbox > > set sendmail='cat > /dev/null' ## or equivalent > > > > No need for a patch, or di

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature

Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: [Fri Aug 15 2008, 10:36:34AM EDT] > One question: will the patch still work when using imap in tunneling mode? Yes, that's how I use it for IMAP servers that don't have Outbox enabled by default, for example: set tunnel="ssh -q imapserver 'set -a; source /etc/courie

Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature

FYI, Rocco's comments on IRC: < pdmef> agriffis: For that patch I'd rather not add two new options but only $sendbox and make mutt use whatever is non-empty from the chain: $sendbox -> $smtp_url -> $sendmail < pdmef> agriffis: Also, why not simply add a function

Improving the mutt development cycle

On Friday, 15 August 2008 at 10:20, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Brendan Cully wrote: >> On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 at 11:28, Aron Griffis wrote: > >>> IMHO mutt should ditch the stable/devel concept and make releases >>> similar to kernel.org. We're never going to fix all the >>> outstanding

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

Rocco Rutte wrote: [Fri Aug 15 2008, 04:21:41AM EDT] > If either way isn't documented (e.g. hooks do/don't work in > batch mode) IMHO it can be seen as a bug that needs to be > fixed. When it possibly breaks setups, we add a note to > UPDATING. Quick search of the manual http://www.mutt.org/doc

Re: [Mutt] #3097: mutt's multi-file -a handling fails for

#3097: mutt's multi-file -a handling fails for POSIX-compliant getopt() -+-- Reporter: jhawk | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor |