mutt: new changeset

New changeset in mutt: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/d3ee9644765f changeset: 5474:d3ee9644765f branch: HEAD tag: tip user:Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> date:Thu Jul 10 09:38:25 2008 -0400 summary: Fix three bugs handling flags in mutt_copy_header -- Reposi

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

[Mutt] #3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames

#3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames +--- Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:01:20PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: > > So this patch adds two settings: sendbox and use_sendbox. > Sendbox specifies a mailbox to which sent messages should be > saved, and use_sendbox instructs mutt to use sendbox instead of > sendmail. For example: > > set sendbo

Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature

Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: [Thu Aug 14 2008, 01:05:06PM EDT] > Why not simply use > > set record=imaps://your.courier.host/INBOX.Outbox > set sendmail='cat > /dev/null' ## or equivalent > > No need for a patch, or did I miss something? I agree that seems like the obvious solution, but it ha

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

> IMHO mutt should ditch the stable/devel concept and make releases > similar to kernel.org. We're never going to fix all the > outstanding bugs for 1.6, so we should release it *now*. Make > point releases (1.6.1 etc) to fix Really Bad Bugs, but otherwise > concentrate on 1.7. To simplify from

Re: [Mutt] #3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely

#3074: Mutt hangs indefinitely -+-- Reporter: jaymzh | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version: 1.5.18 Resolut

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 at 11:28, Aron Griffis wrote: > Kyle Wheeler wrote: [Wed Aug 13 2008, 10:52:29AM EDT] > > Well, I imagine anyone currently using mutt in batch mode on a regular > > basis (e.g. with cron) already has a working setup, and enabling hooks > > by default has the potent

Re: [Mutt] #3084: mutt 1.5.6i: Segmentation fault when trying to

#3084: mutt 1.5.6i: Segmentation fault when trying to write mailbox (as non-root) -+-- Reporter: silasb | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone:

Re: [Mutt] #3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames

#3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames -+-- Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt| Version:

Re: [PATCH v2] make send-hooks work for batch mode

Brendan Cully wrote: [Thu Aug 14 2008, 06:12:36PM EDT] > On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 at 11:28, Aron Griffis wrote: > > IMHO mutt should ditch the stable/devel concept and make releases > > similar to kernel.org. We're never going to fix all the > > outstanding bugs for 1.6, so we should release

Re: [Mutt] #3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames

#3105: -a does not work with multiple filenames +--- Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: 1.6 Component: mutt |

Re: [Mutt] #3097: mutt's multi-file -a handling fails for

#3097: mutt's multi-file -a handling fails for POSIX-compliant getopt() -+-- Reporter: jhawk | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor |