mutt: new changeset

New changeset in mutt: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/2a9e9c487bad changeset: 5449:2a9e9c487bad branch: HEAD tag: tip user:Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> date:Wed Jul 09 09:14:25 2008 + summary: Document redirection to trigger batch send mode in mutt(1) and

[no subject]

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 09:41:23 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [PATCH 0 of 3] fixes for mutt_copy_header Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:41:22 -0400 From: Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECT

[no subject]

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 09:41:24 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [PATCH 1 of 3] Clean up error handling in mutt_copy_header X-Mercurial-Node: f005e1a25900d3df40963adcee04e384ac33b29b Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[no subject]

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 09:41:25 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [PATCH 2 of 3] Unify mutt_write_references X-Mercurial-Node: 73431d86627a2ccb24218c0f1f3b6b399860067e Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To:

[no subject]

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 09:41:26 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [PATCH 3 of 3] Fix three bugs handling flags in mutt_copy_header X-Mercurial-Node: 95485bbbeea33e82dec544c4d007194390a3b109 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PR

[PATCH 0 of 3] fixes for mutt_copy_header

Here's some bugfixes and cleanup (53 fewer lines!) for copy.c copy.c| 176 ++-- protos.h |1 sendlib.c | 10 +- 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1 of 3] Clean up error handling in mutt_copy_header

# HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215697105 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID f005e1a25900d3df40963adcee04e384ac33b29b # Parent 2a9e9c487badce3ab39797d52d01666f36b07e7f Clean up error handling in mutt_copy_header mutt_copy_header unnecessarily tests the result of ea

[PATCH 2 of 3] Unify mutt_write_references

# HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215697105 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID 73431d86627a2ccb24218c0f1f3b6b399860067e # Parent f005e1a25900d3df40963adcee04e384ac33b29b Unify mutt_write_references copy.c and sendlib.c have independent and different implementations o

[PATCH 3 of 3] Fix three bugs handling flags in mutt_copy_header

# HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215697105 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID 95485bbbeea33e82dec544c4d007194390a3b109 # Parent 73431d86627a2ccb24218c0f1f3b6b399860067e Fix three bugs handling flags in mutt_copy_header 1. mutt_copy_header incorrectly tests CH_UPDATE

[PATCH] Remove completely wrong comment regarding in-reply-to and references

# HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215715495 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID a0059b26988d7b8474a8e565ca4aa982f050f394 # Parent 2a9e9c487badce3ab39797d52d01666f36b07e7f Remove completely wrong comment regarding in-reply-to and references ...plus fix one other commen

Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] Unify mutt_write_references

Aron Griffis wrote: [Thu Jul 10 2008, 09:41:24AM EDT] > diff -r f005e1a25900 -r 73431d86627a copy.c > --- a/copy.c Thu Jul 10 09:38:25 2008 -0400 > +++ b/copy.c Thu Jul 10 09:38:25 2008 -0400 > @@ -369,11 +369,11 @@ >if (h->env->irt_changed && h->env->in_reply_to) >{ > LIST

Re: [PATCH] Remove completely wrong comment regarding in-reply-to

Hi, * Aron Griffis wrote: # HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215715495 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID a0059b26988d7b8474a8e565ca4aa982f050f394 # Parent 2a9e9c487badce3ab39797d52d01666f36b07e7f Remove completely wrong comment regarding in-reply-to and references

Re: [Mutt] #2942: header cache is still not safe

#2942: header cache is still not safe Comment (by pdmef): Add patch updating hcache upon mailbox sync for IMAP, Maildir and MH (can't do it for POP as the ACLs we need to enable for updating to be useful would allow too many operations like editing messages). -- Ticket URL:

Re: [Mutt] #2942: header cache is still not safe

#2942: header cache is still not safe Comment (by pdmef): (In [b9ac445b035b]) Prevent some pointers of 'struct body' being saved to hcache This addresses the hcache safety issue but maybe doesn't fix it completely, see #2942. This also prevents mutt from crashing when using a hcache that wa

Re: your mail

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:10:46AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Clean up error handling in mutt_copy_header > > mutt_copy_header unnecessarily tests the result of each fputc/fputs (well, > most > of them anyway, it's not consistent). This obfuscates the code and hides > bugs. > Remove thes

[PATCH] Unify parser for message-ids

# HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215732600 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID da4e7495a595b4e0589c679d8c39f897fec0d2b0 # Parent 2a9e9c487badce3ab39797d52d01666f36b07e7f Unify parser for message-ids Rewrite mutt_extract_message_id and change mutt_parse_references to

Re: [PATCH] Unify parser for message-ids

Fix spelling error and my email address # HG changeset patch # User Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1215732600 14400 # Branch HEAD # Node ID da4e7495a595b4e0589c679d8c39f897fec0d2b0 # Parent 2a9e9c487badce3ab39797d52d01666f36b07e7f Unify parser for message-ids Rewrite mutt_extract_messag

Re: your mail

David Laight wrote: [Thu Jul 10 2008, 04:42:10PM EDT] > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:10:46AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Clean up error handling in mutt_copy_header > > > > mutt_copy_header unnecessarily tests the result of each fputc/fputs (well, > > most > > of them anyway, it's not cons

Re: [Mutt] #3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field

#3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field Comment (by agriffis): I posted 3090-mutt_extract_message_id-no-static.patch (unmodified) to mutt-dev with appropriate mercurial headers. -- Ticket URL:

Re: your mail

Aron Griffis wrote: [Thu Jul 10 2008, 07:48:41PM EDT] > Updated patch with call to ferror() follows. I mean with call to fflush(). I'm hitting send a bit too quickly.

Re: [Mutt] #3087: No server hostname validation in SSL certificate

#3087: No server hostname validation in SSL certificate processing Changes (by pdmef): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: (In [934a802dff7f]) Verify hostname in (Open)SSL certificate validation This is based on the patch by gkloepfer attached to #3087 but passes th