Hi,
* Dan Fandrich wrote:
I've revisited the performance patch I sent and found a problem due to
an incorrect assumption. Here's a new version that stores the group
addresses in a hash table instead of a linked list so group lookups can
be much faster.
Just out of curiosity: How many groups
Hi,
* N.J. Mann wrote:
Automake is one of those things that has passed me by over the years, so
trying to "fix" this problem has not been fun. The attached changes do
work (for me at least), but they really need an automake expert to look
over and correct. :-)
Another approach that could sol
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:45:13AM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Just out of curiosity: How many groups do you have defined? I didn't look in
> detail at when and how often mutt needs to lookup groups, though...
I only have a small handful of groups, but I'm using the default group
patch I sent ear
#3045: mutt-1.5.17: limiting by body pattern without gpg-agent asks for
passphrase
over and over again
{{{
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.17
Severity: normal
-- Please type your report below this line
When trying to limit a folder that contains GPG-encrypted mail to myself
with a body-pattern
