>Number: 2808
>Notify-List:
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: changed / added %-expansion in save-hook
>Confidential: no
>Severity: minor
>Priority: low
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arr
> It would also be nice to have mechanisms to simplify composing
> multipart/alternative e-mail.
Can you show me one single case where using multipart/alternative is
justified and actually makes any sense? It's bad enough to receive
bloated text+html email from clueless Outlook users, I don
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-02-28 08:49 -0800:
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 09:47, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > Also, I think the current way of creating it is not very optimal since I
> > (still) consider DocBook a format which is to be generated by machines,
> > not written by hum
>Number: 2809
>Notify-List:
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: wish: collapse sub-thread
>Confidential: no
>Severity: minor
>Priority: low
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Da
* On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 Brendan Cully ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
Not patches per se, but I'd like to see
mime_lookup application/octet-stream
and
use_envelope_from=yes
be default
ok... We'll need some cygwin-conditional code in the library that
tries to do safer temporary files on Unix.
(And some overall thinking as to whether we're going a step too far
there.)
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2007-03-01 11:54:54 +, Taleb Hakim wrote:
> From: Taleb H
* Brendan Cully on Thursday, February 22, 2007 at 09:30:33 -0800:
> I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and whi
Hi,
* Christian Ebert [07-03-01 13:28:09 +0100] wrote:
* Brendan Cully on Thursday, February 22, 2007 at 09:30:33 -0800:
I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which
On Thursday, February 22 at 09:30 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
I do not intend to visit the great config-var rename topic until
after 1.6 by the way. I think it would need too much time to deal
with the fallout.
It would still probably be good to add documentation for the groups
that Thomas added
Hey everybody,
Regarding my email a few days ago:
> I was trying to access it because I wanted to find out about the status
> of "delsp" ala rfc3676. This is of keen interest to me because of
> certain insufferable mac users who keep emailing me "broken" URLs. I
> happily add my vote to the "we
>Number: 2810
>Notify-List:
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: mbox folder changes content while in pager, then moving
>through msgs => out of sync
>Confidential: no
>Severity: minor
>Priority: low
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Cla
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2808; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: mutt/2808: changed / added %-expansion in save-hook
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:09:54 -0700
--WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; bou
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:33:17PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Miroslav Lichvar 2007-02-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > attached is a patch that makes the buffy size option configurable at
> > runtime. Mutt binary compiled with --enable-buffy-size will
> > have an extra boolean variable that cont
* On 2007.03.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Lars Hecking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you show me one single case where using multipart/alternative is
> justified and actually makes any sense? It's bad enough to receive
> bloated text+html email from clueless Outlook users, I don't
Synopsis: make hostname part of Message-IDs configurable
Comment added by cb on Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:26:04 +0100
update title
>Number: 2811
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: Bug#413014: mutt: Handling of e-mails with multiple Message-IDs
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:
Hi all,
I've reconverted the mutt CVS repository to Mercurial, hopefully for
the last time (the previous conversion had a bug where cloning a
single branch other than HEAD left you without any tags).
The URL is: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/cvs
Those of you who already started working off of the old r
On Thursday, March 1 at 11:39 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Hi all,
I've reconverted the mutt CVS repository to Mercurial, hopefully for
the last time (the previous conversion had a bug where cloning a
single branch other than HEAD left you without any tags).
The URL is: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/cvs
On Thursday, 01 March 2007 at 13:10, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday, March 1 at 11:39 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've reconverted the mutt CVS repository to Mercurial, hopefully for
> >the last time (the previous conversion had a bug where cloning a
> >single branch other than H
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've reconverted the mutt CVS repository to Mercurial,
[...]
>
> The URL is: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/cvs
Just a nitpick, but maybe a different name would prevent confusion about
whether it's CVS or Mercurial?
i.e. "repos" or whatever instead of "cvs".
Hi All,
I'm a long time mutt user. I just upgraded my freebsd 6.2 stable box
to the latest 1.5.14 mutt version.
The index view is sorted by thread, and every sub-message has a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@>
This problem didn't happen with 1.5.13. If it makes a difference I'm
using putty to ssh into t
* Brendan Cully [Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:30:33 -0800]:
> So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
Personally, I can't live without hr.sensible_browser_position [1]. It
makes mutt remember the position in the browser when v
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:23:28PM -0800, Ryan Phillips wrote:
> This problem didn't happen with 1.5.13. If it makes a difference I'm
> using putty to ssh into the box.
I seem to remember having that problem when putty and the terminal had
different ideas about what encoding to use. I solved it
On Mar 01, David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In fact I don't think it's incumbent upon us to justify giving mutt
> common-practice features when the only reason not to do it is that mutt
> loses some perceived moral superiority. This is like the old
> descriptive/prescriptive dichotomy in
Re: Brendan Cully 2007-02-24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > i have worked on PKA support for Mutt. Seems to work so far,
> > would be
> > great if it could be integrated into CVS. It probably needs some
> > more
> > work (review, testing, etc.), though.
> >
> Applied (with $use_pka renamed to $crypt_us
On Thursday, 01 March 2007 at 14:31, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've reconverted the mutt CVS repository to Mercurial,
> [...]
> >
> > The URL is: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/cvs
>
> Just a nitpick, but maybe a different name would prevent confusion abou
On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
Can you show me one single case where using multipart/alternative is
justified and actually makes any sense? It's bad enough to receive
bloated text+html email from clueless Outlook users, I don't want to
see such mail from mutt users, too.
This message was generated and sent automatically. It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours. These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two. Most probably, they have already been propagated.
2007-03-02 01:25:41 Petr Pisar <[EMAI
On Wednesday, February 28 at 06:50 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Thanks for the patch! I think the cleanup should be done at
close, so I've applied a variant of this to CVS. Can you
test whether CVS fixes this (it appears to here)?
This works fantastically for me. Thanks very much!
~Kyle
--
If A eq
Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:23:28PM -0800, Ryan Phillips wrote:
>
> > This problem didn't happen with 1.5.13. If it makes a difference I'm
> > using putty to ssh into the box.
>
> I seem to remember having that problem when putty and the terminal had
> diff
The following reply was made to PR mutt/1116; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mutt/1116: Fails to thread properly without an @ in msg ID
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:18:42 +1100
On 27Feb2007 21:15, Christo
The following reply was made to PR imap/2717; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: imap/2717: mutt may appear to hang while it reconnects to IMAP
server
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:56:44 -0700
--oXNgvKVxGW
* Rocco Rutte on Wednesday, February 28, 2007 at 09:39:03 +:
> * Rocco Rutte [07-02-26 17:59:44 +] wrote:
>> It needs some style tweaks and I'm still not fully sure if the
>> space-stuffing it does it totally right (especially when editing the same
>> message several times via compose men
33 matches
Mail list logo
