Hi TAKIZAWA-san,
Could you explain the difference between
1.5.6-assumed.1 (Christoph's one) and 1.5.14-assumed.1?
I have a poor memory.
* Mon Feb 26 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:11:49PM -0800,
> Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at
After first having looked at creating patches for mutt for the full
implementation, I am now actively working on making a separate library
for implementing 'folder' capability keys, that when finished could be called
from more lightweight patches to mutt.
As these patches will need to go to many p
This message was generated and sent automatically. It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours. These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two. Most probably, they have already been propagated.
2007-02-25 01:32:31 Brendan Cully <[E
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2799; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: mutt/2799: Avoid gpgme (AM_PATH_GPGME) dependency for autoconf
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:15:28 +0100
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:12:35AM +0100, Rob Meijer wrote:
> The 'mail capability key' or mck library is meant as an anti-spam solution
> using a 'folder extended' e-mail address as a capability key.
Isn't the MDA (i.e., procmail) and the MTA (i.e., qmail-inject) the correct
place to implement t
Hi, Tamotsu-san.
Perhaps the difference is:
- a bugfix concerning memory allocation
- "+tamo" part, which is result thing of discussion by Tamotsu and Alain
- a new patch is safer.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:01:21PM +0900,
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> Could you explain the difference betwe
Hi, Brendan Cully!
Sometime (on Thursday, February 22 at 19:31) I've received something...
>I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
>proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
>1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
>l
Hi,
* Brendan Cully [07-02-23 23:10:57 -0800] wrote:
It doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. But can someone remind me what
the objections were to the compressed-folder patch?
I don't really like the implementation because it enforces mbox. It
would be much nicer (and have a much better desi
On Monday, 26 February 2007 at 18:37, Andriy N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hi, Brendan Cully!
>
> Sometime (on Thursday, February 22 at 19:31) I've received something...
> >I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> >proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze aft
On Sunday, 25 February 2007 at 19:08, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> > proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> > 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patc
Hi,
* Brendan Cully [07-02-22 09:30:33 -0800] wrote:
So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
What I really love is the replacement patch for format=flowed messages
as a result of the mutt-ng fork. The code is much s
Re: Brendan Cully 2007-02-24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Small remark: it seems to have a hardwired set of "good"
> > terminals. Neither or mine (rxvt-unicode and screen-256color-bce)
> > is one it. Or is that just for the default setting, overridable? No
> > ncurses/slang query for this capability?
>
Re: Rocco Rutte 2007-02-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >It doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. But can someone remind me what
> >the objections were to the compressed-folder patch?
I think the main objection is that it breaks if the compressed folder
is opened while the compressed file is modified (e.g
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 03:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-02-22 09:30:33 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > I intend to cut 1.5.14 this weekend. I'd like to make 1.5.15 the last
> > proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> > 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again whic
Hi,
* Rocco Rutte [07-02-26 16:59:30 +] wrote:
* Brendan Cully [07-02-22 09:30:33 -0800] wrote:
What I really love is the replacement patch for format=flowed messages as a result of the mutt-ng fork. The code is much simpler (and easier to maintain) and it's capable
of really flowing text
This sounds a lot like what TMDA already does. And I don't see why it
needs to patch mutt to work.
On Monday, 26 February 2007 at 09:12, Rob Meijer wrote:
> After first having looked at creating patches for mutt for the full
> implementation, I am now actively working on making a separate library
Re: To Mutt Developers 2007-02-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (And there could be a check that the mtime of the folder is still the
> same - which might already be there, didn't check.)
Looking into the patch it does check the original folder:
int mutt_check_mailbox_compressed (CONTEXT* ctx)
{
COMPRE
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2799; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: mutt/2799: Avoid gpgme (AM_PATH_GPGME) dependency for autoconf
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:39:03 +0100
On 2007-02-26 14:05:01 +0100, Werner Ko
Synopsis: Avoid gpgme (AM_PATH_GPGME) dependency for autoconf
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: brendan
State-Changed-When: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:54:55 +0100
State-Changed-Why:
gpgme.m4 is now bundled.
Comment added by brendan on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:54:55 +0100
On 26Feb2007 18:43, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Re: Rocco Rutte 2007-02-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
| > I don't really like the implementation because it enforces mbox. It
| > would be much nicer (and have a much better design) if it could just
| > uncompress the file and let mut
On 2007-02-26 09:45:19 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 03:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > * My "Save History" patch, to be able to save the history between
> > sessions.
> >
> > http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/patches/patch-1.5.12.vl.savehist.1
>
> I like this one too, and
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 at 02:06, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-02-26 09:45:19 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 03:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > * My "Save History" patch, to be able to save the history between
> > > sessions.
> > >
> > > http://www.vinc17.
This message was generated and sent automatically. It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours. These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two. Most probably, they have already been propagated.
2007-02-27 01:10:57 Brendan Cully <[E
23 matches
Mail list logo
