Hi
The partition where my MBox-files lie is the only one i have to mount without
'noatime'.
As i don't know when relatime comes for the rest of the filesystems (ocfs2
wouldn't be my choice for a filesystem, only to satisfy mutt a bit better) i
thought about:
'Why doesn't mutt set the atime ex
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 23Feb2007 00:04, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| xtitles is also very nice. What could be improved is that the default
| for xterm_set_titles must currently be off because TERM is evaluated
| at the time the variable is set. If the defau
Hello!
On 2007-02-22 09:30:33, Brendan Cully wrote:
> So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
>
I would like my imap_recent patch, it is a must have for me.
"http://bugs.mutt.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?debug=&database=mu
Synopsis: abort executes "folder-hook" for '.' pattern at least
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: rado
State-Changed-When: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:42:34 +0100
State-Changed-Why:
mistaken, local cfg side effect
Comment added by rado on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:42:34 +0100
Re: Cameron Simpson 2007-02-23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | xtitles is also very nice. What could be improved is that the default
> | for xterm_set_titles must currently be off because TERM is evaluated
> | at the time the variable is set. If the default is fine, the patch is
> | as well, but if it shou
>Number: 2798
>Notify-List:
>Category: mutt
>Synopsis: /var/mail/root: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: normal
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:mutt-dev
>State: open
>Keywords:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitt
Synopsis: /var/mail/root: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rado
State-Changed-When: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:12:39 +0100
State-Changed-Why:
Sounds like a cfg problem rather than code.
Comment added by rado on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:12:39
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
Moritz Schulte posted a patch to implement gpg's PKA[1]
On 2007-02-23 18:00:34 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> I really would like to see PKA support in Mutt; in particular as
> this is based on an idea Thomas an me developed once.
Err, yes, +1. This is one of the balls I dropped while not meaning
to.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
mutt-1.5.14 is now available on ftp.mutt.org. It's just a collection
of bug fixes since the last release, since I'm about to apply a bunch
of new patches to the tree.
pgpNFAoMIeKG7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, February 23 at 09:52 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
Hi all,
mutt-1.5.14 is now available on ftp.mutt.org. It's just a collection
of bug fixes since the last release, since I'm about to apply a bunch
of new patches to the tree.
I presume (hope?) that cvs is still functional for this?
~Kyl
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 11:22, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, February 23 at 09:52 AM, quoth Brendan Cully:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >mutt-1.5.14 is now available on ftp.mutt.org. It's just a collection
> >of bug fixes since the last release, since I'm about to apply a bunch
> >of new patches to t
Since we are talking about new features, I'd like to remind the list
about this regression introduced last year.
It is especially annoying for me since it broke the hooks which I use to
enable PGP signing when replying to user agents which support it.
- Forwarded message from Adeodato Simó <[E
On Feb 22, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Brendan is taking the lead for releasing things and deciding what
> > gets into the repository. I understand he has some plans, including
> > moving the master rep
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 13:55, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Feb 22, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Brendan is taking the lead for releasing things and deciding what
> > > gets into the reposito
On Feb 23, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 13:55, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > On Feb 22, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Brendan is taking the lead for r
On 2007-02-23 14:06:33 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> I can't, I don't manage the DNS. I think ME still does.
Steve Kennedy does. I've sent mail.
--
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Feb 23, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 2007-02-23 14:06:33 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> > I can't, I don't manage the DNS. I think ME still does.
>
> Steve Kennedy does. I've sent mail.
That we'll want an update later, or want one now?
If it changes before the links are
* On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> >Number: 2798
> >Category: mutt
> >Synopsis: /var/mail/root: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
> >Originator: Dinko S. Dinev
> >Environment:
> Dell Optiplex GX 620, FreeBSD 6.2
> >Description:
> Whe
The following reply was made to PR mutt/2798; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Developers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mutt/2798: /var/mail/root: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:22:08 +0100
* On Fri, Feb 23, 2007
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 14:06, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Feb 23, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 13:55, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > On Feb 22, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 09:11, Thomas Roessler wro
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > proper dev release for 1.6 - that is, feature-freeze after
> > 1.5.15. So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> > like to see in 1.6 (and which patches peop
On Friday, February 23 at 05:40 PM, quoth Jeff Macdonald:
DomainKeys and DKIM support would be nice too.
What do you mean? DomainKeys and DKIM *signing* is meant to be an MTA
function, not an MUA function. Do you want to be able to verify these
signatures in Mutt? (which can be done as an MTA
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:51:19PM -0700, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, February 23 at 05:40 PM, quoth Jeff Macdonald:
> >DomainKeys and DKIM support would be nice too.
>
> What do you mean? DomainKeys and DKIM *signing* is meant to be an MTA
> function, not an MUA function. Do you want to be
On Feb 23, Brendan Cully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've made mutt.kublai.com and dev.mutt.org the same on my system, so
> if you want to do things seamlessly, you can use these links at
> mutt.kublai.com, then change them to the same links at dev.mutt.org
> once the DNS update has been made:
>
>
This message was generated and sent automatically. It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours. These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two. Most probably, they have already been propagated.
2007-02-23 17:38:25 brendan (brendan)
On Wednesday, 01 November 2006 at 19:42, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> i have worked on PKA support for Mutt. Seems to work so far, would be
> great if it could be integrated into CVS. It probably needs some more
> work (review, testing, etc.), though.
>
> I have attached two patches:
On Thursday, 22 February 2007 at 18:33, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2007-02-22 09:30:33 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > I'll probably apply my ESMTP patch (*dons flame suit*)
>
> *activates flame thrower*
>
> (But up to you.)
I've applied it. I hope it doesn't make too many of you give up mut
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 14:18, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> | xtitles is also very nice. What could be improved is that the default
> | for xterm_set_titles must currently be off because TERM is evaluated
> | at the time the variable is set. If the default is fine, the patch is
> | as well, but
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 00:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > >assumed-charset might be a good idea too.
>
> http://svn.df7cb.de/debian/mutt/trunk/debian/patches/features/assumed-charset
I've applied this one.
pgph3SOM3KmZm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 13:40, Jorgen Hermanrud Fjeld wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 2007-02-22 09:30:33, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > So, I'd like to hear once again which patches everyone would
> > like to see in 1.6 (and which patches people object to).
> >
> I would like my imap_recent patch, it i
On Friday, February 23 at 10:16 PM, quoth Brendan Cully:
On Wednesday, 01 November 2006 at 19:42, Moritz Schulte wrote:
Hello all,
i have worked on PKA support for Mutt. Seems to work so far, would be
great if it could be integrated into CVS. It probably needs some more
work (review, testin
32 matches
Mail list logo
