Re: segfault: d5ab883ef90a breaks header cache

2007-04-03 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 03 April 2007 at 09:46, Thomas Roessler wrote: > d5ab883ef90a reproducibly leads to segmentation faults in either > line 999 or 1002 of hcache.c. At that point, h->db is a NULL > pointer which is dereferenced. > > Backing out d5ab883ef90a cures that. > > To reproduce the problem, run

Re: segfault: d5ab883ef90a breaks header cache

2007-04-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 03-04-2007 11:12:29 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 03-04-2007 09:46:13 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > d5ab883ef90a reproducibly leads to segmentation faults in either > > line 999 or 1002 of hcache.c. At that point, h->db is a NULL > > pointer which is dereferenced. > > > > Backing out d

Re: segfault: d5ab883ef90a breaks header cache

2007-04-03 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 03-04-2007 09:46:13 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > d5ab883ef90a reproducibly leads to segmentation faults in either > line 999 or 1002 of hcache.c. At that point, h->db is a NULL > pointer which is dereferenced. > > Backing out d5ab883ef90a cures that. I reverse-patched that particular patch

segfault: d5ab883ef90a breaks header cache

2007-04-03 Thread Thomas Roessler
d5ab883ef90a reproducibly leads to segmentation faults in either line 999 or 1002 of hcache.c. At that point, h->db is a NULL pointer which is dereferenced. Backing out d5ab883ef90a cures that. To reproduce the problem, run tip with the header_cache variable set. Regards -- Thomas Roessler <