On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:36:56PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:09:01AM -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> > Is there any interest in supporting mix format in mutt? The idea
> > seems interesting to me - it's kind of a hybrid of Maildir and mbox
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:09:01AM -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> Is there any interest in supporting mix format in mutt? The idea seems
> interesting to me - it's kind of a hybrid of Maildir and mbox - there
> are multiple messages per file, but they're broken up into small
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:22:35PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> "Oh no. Yet another folder format."
At least he documented it this time, unlike the mbx format that PINE
used, which really was a case of source code == documentation.
me
On 2007-02-27 11:09:01 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> Is there any interest in supporting mix format in mutt? The idea
> seems interesting to me - it's kind of a hybrid of Maildir and
> mbox - there are multiple messages per file, but they're broken
> up into smaller chunk
Oh - sorry...
meant to include this link:
http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/mixfmt.txt.html
w
x27;m guesssing mutt would want to implement it
independently of c-client, though I imagine some code could be
"borrowed" without any license violations)...
Is there any interest in supporting mix format in mutt? The idea seems
interesting to me - it's kind of a hybrid of Maildir
