#3287: imap recent not honoured
-+--
Reporter: prlw1 | Owner: brendan
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6
#3287: imap recent not honoured
---+
Reporter: prlw1 | Owner: brendan
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6
#3287: imap recent not honoured
-+--
Reporter: prlw1 | Owner: brendan
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 1.6
#3287: imap recent not honoured
---+
Reporter: prlw1 | Owner: brendan
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:45:44AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday, June 11 at 01:38 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
> >I don't use the header cache - I would have to enable it to use it
> >right?
> >(off by default?)
>
> Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Yeah, you'd have to enable it.Hmm.
>
Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Yeah, you'd have to enable it.
> Hmm. I don't know how mutt handles new/old tracking on IMAP without
> the header cache, but with a mailbox that big, it's going to be well
> worth your while to enable it.
I think via message flags.
On Thursday, June 11 at 01:38 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
I don't use the header cache - I would have to enable it to use it
right?
(off by default?)
Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Yeah, you'd have to enable it.
Hmm. I don't know how mutt handles new/old tracking on IMAP without
the head
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:49:45PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, June 8 at 12:21 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
> >Now I'm even more confused: mutt says after several days of not
> >reading mail, mutt says:
> >
> >Msgs:220272 New:6 Old:710
> >
> >and those refer to the 6 new messages I receiv
On Monday, June 8 at 12:21 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
Now I'm even more confused: mutt says after several days of not
reading mail, mutt says:
Msgs:220272 New:6 Old:710
and those refer to the 6 new messages I received while it is open.
YIKES - that is a *huge* mailbox!
It's interesting that
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:32:09AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Monday, June 1 at 10:27 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
> >So the first question is, am I missing a new setting in mutt?
>
> No - mutt's current behavior uses both \Unseen and \Recent along with
> its own header cache in order to be rel
On Monday, June 1 at 10:27 PM, quoth Patrick Welche:
So the first question is, am I missing a new setting in mutt?
No - mutt's current behavior uses both \Unseen and \Recent along with
its own header cache in order to be reliable across multiple brands of
IMAP servers.
And then how do I t
Just trying today's mutt-head against a cyrus imap server. The only
messages marked N are the ones which arrived while the inbox was open in
mutt, not the ones which arrived since the inbox was last opened.
[I think I used to have set imap_recent=yes, but now I see that imap_recent
no longer exist
12 matches
Mail list logo
