On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:08:12PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:46:48PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
I'm thinking about enabling $rfc2047_parameters by default, and would like
to hear any counter-arguments against this.
I believe the original argument against was th
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 02:46:48PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I'm thinking about enabling $rfc2047_parameters by default, and would like
> to hear any counter-arguments against this.
I believe the original argument against was that doing so violates the
RFCs, and therefore potentially obscu
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote in
:
|I'm thinking about enabling $rfc2047_parameters by default, and would
|like to hear any counter-arguments against this.
|
|Here we are in 2022, yet I still occasionally receive tickets, or most
|recently even a merge request (!154), about this. Obviously some
