> However since I use lua 5.2.1 I fail to compile lumail, is there any
> reason for using 5.1?
5.1 and 5.2 are available in Debian's stable release, the release upon which
I want to run the client. So I've tested against both of those.
Steve
--
http://www.steve.org.uk/
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:09:12PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> I recently came across references to the idea of
> adding scripting to mutt:
>
>
> http://www.archivum.info/mutt-dev@mutt.org/2013-01/00120/Re-Lua-vis-a-vis-Python.html
>
> I wanted to say that a scriptable email client is
>
I recently came across references to the idea of
adding scripting to mutt:
http://www.archivum.info/mutt-dev@mutt.org/2013-01/00120/Re-Lua-vis-a-vis-Python.html
I wanted to say that a scriptable email client is
a very useful thing. Although it is in no way as
complete as Mutt I have
On Monday, 21 January 2013 at 13:17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> On 2013-01-20 12:47:13 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > This has actually been done before, with guile as the scripting
> > language. Personally I think that's not the best choice, and either
> > python or lua would be better. The old
On 2013-01-20 12:47:13 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> This has actually been done before, with guile as the scripting
> language. Personally I think that's not the best choice, and either
> python or lua would be better. The old code has certainly rotted, and
> I don't know of anyone working script
* On 20 Jan 2013, Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> This has actually been done before, with guile as the scripting
> language. Personally I think that's not the best choice, and either
> python or lua would be better. The old code has certainly rotted, and
> I don't know of anyone working scripting now,
Forwarding this to mutt-dev.
On Friday, 18 January 2013 at 15:55, sergei karhof wrote:
> Hi Brendan,
>
> I am contacting you because you are the main developer of Mutt.
> I am strongly attracted to Mutt, and I was thinking to adopt it, but I read
> somewhere that it does not support scripting. If
