Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-21 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Heinz Diehl [03-21-18 02:19]: > On 13.03.2018, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > > That's probably why these two mails slipped though my procmail filters. > > Am I the 0.01 % still using that? > > Nope. Procmail rocks :-) > > > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subj

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-20 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 13.03.2018, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > That's probably why these two mails slipped though my procmail filters. > Am I the 0.01 % still using that? Nope. Procmail rocks :-) > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > prefix? It really makes identifying the ema

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-18 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kevin, On Sunday, 2018-03-18 12:22:11 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:44:57PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > My bad. Because Stuart put me on Cc:, I only got the direct mail, and > > not through the list. (I just reconfigured that @mailman... Stupid > > preferen

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-18 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Mon 19 Mar 2018 08:22:11 NZDT +1300, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > My bad. Because Stuart put me on Cc:, I only got the direct mail, and > > not through the list. (I just reconfigured that @mailman... Stupid > > preference. Was it that way before?) > > I hadn't noticed the setting, but just fou

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-18 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:44:57PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:56:12 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > P.S.: 'L' no longer works without "subscribe". :-P > > > > This should be working still. The List-Post header is there. Is anyone > > else seeing this problem

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-18 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:56:12 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > P.S.: 'L' no longer works without "subscribe". :-P > > This should be working still. The List-Post header is there. Is anyone > else seeing this problem? My bad. Because Stuart put me on Cc:, I only got the direct mail, and no

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-18 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:58:46AM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > P.S.: 'L' no longer works without "subscribe". :-P This should be working still. The List-Post header is there. Is anyone else seeing this problem? -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-14 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Derek Martin [03-14-18 12:23]: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:57:29AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/03/13 00:44, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > > > prefix? It really makes identifying the emails outside of the flas

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-14 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:57:29AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/03/13 00:44, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > > prefix? It really makes identifying the emails outside of the flashy > > luxurious filterung Unix world (i.e

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-13 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 08:57:29 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > This has a cost: it breaks DKIM. Okay, I just read up on RFC 6377. So "-1" from myself as well. ;) Thanks, Moritz P.S.: 'L' no longer works without "subscribe". :-P

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/03/13 00:44, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > Would it be asking a lot to request an automatic "[mutt-dev] " subject > prefix? It really makes identifying the emails outside of the flashy > luxurious filterung Unix world (i.e. on my smartphone or in the > webmailer) so much easier! This has a cost

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-12 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Moritz Barsnick [03-12-18 19:47]: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 23:18:51 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > > On the good side: there's now a > > List-Id: > > header one can use to filter incoming mail, additionally to > > List-Post: > > Nice! > > > For who needs it, the old >

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-12 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 13Mar2018 00:44, Moritz Barsnick wrote: For who needs it, the old Sender: owner-mutt-...@mutt.org is now replaced by Sender: Mutt-dev That's probably why these two mails slipped though my procmail filters. Am I the 0.01 % still using that? No, I'm doing the same. Would it be asking

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-12 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 23:18:51 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > On the good side: there's now a > List-Id: > header one can use to filter incoming mail, additionally to > List-Post: Nice! > For who needs it, the old > Sender: owner-mutt-...@mutt.org > is now replaced by >

Re: Mailing list status

2018-03-12 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kevin, On Monday, 2018-03-12 12:32:31 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > The new mailing list server uses GNU mailman. There are likely a few > things that need to be tweeked. Please let me know about any issues. On the good side: there's now a List-Id: header one can use to filter incoming

Mailing list status

2018-03-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Hi Everyone, Last Friday night, our mailing list and website server suffered a catastrophic failure. Fortunately, for the past couple months I have already been working on moving our mailing lists to OSUOSL. I had planned a couple more steps to transition smoothly, but given the failure have acc