Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:26:04PM +0200, rear1019 wrote: > Derek Martin provided the crucial hint by explaining the way he > interprets the very last part of: > > When [$reverse_realname] is set, mutt will use the address from > incoming messages as-is, possibly including eventual real names.

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:12:06 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:26:47PM +0200, rear1019 wrote: > > The ticket assumes that both $reverse_name and $reverse_realname are > > set. In this configuration mutt should reuse the To: header of the > > message replied to as-is in

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 09:12:06AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:26:47PM +0200, rear1019 wrote: > >The ticket assumes that both $reverse_name and $reverse_realname > >are set. In this configuration mutt should reuse the To: header of > >the message replied to as-is in

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:26:47PM +0200, rear1019 wrote: The ticket assumes that both $reverse_name and $reverse_realname are set. In this configuration mutt should reuse the To: header of the message replied to as-is in the reply’s From: header, even if the name is empty. The documentation

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 13:27:08 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > On Saturday, 2019-06-08 14:20:49 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > >> Right now, if a To address is missing the personal (name) part, the From >> will be filled in with $realname in the reply. >> >> The ticket submitter expects that if the

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

Hi Kevin, On Saturday, 2019-06-08 14:20:49 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Right now, if a To address is missing the personal (name) part, the From > will be filled in with $realname in the reply. > > The ticket submitter expects that if the To address was missing a name, the > reply From addr

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 01:02:25PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: That isn't what I want, and I have $reverse_realname=no in my own config. But I agree with the change. Thanks. I appreciate feedback before approaching tweeks to old behavior like this. I'll wait a few days to give others time

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On 08Jun2019 14:59, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:41:40PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:20:49PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: I think it's a reasonable expectation, but would like to confirm that opinion with others before I merge the patch.

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:41:40PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:20:49PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: I think it's a reasonable expectation, but would like to confirm that opinion with others before I merge the patch. Sorry, I forwarded this to the list a bit to

Re: Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:20:49PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: I think it's a reasonable expectation, but would like to confirm that opinion with others before I merge the patch. Sorry, I forwarded this to the list a bit too quickly. After just a bit more thought I realized the patch is i

Feedback on ticket 146 - $reverse_realname behavior

Ticket 146 has a patch to tweek the behavior of $reverse_realname slightly. Right now, if a To address is missing the personal (name) part, the From will be filled in with $realname in the reply. The ticket submitter expects that if the To address