Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:27:42PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Noah Slater [07-20-09 22:36]: > > > > I cannot search for multi-word strings such as "f:noah slater" but > > instead have to encode this as "f:noah f:slater". The whole syntax > > for specifying queries is awkward and bizarre.

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-20 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Noah Slater [07-20-09 22:36]: > > I cannot search for multi-word strings such as "f:noah slater" but > instead have to encode this as "f:noah f:slater". The whole syntax > for specifying queries is awkward and bizarre. Something more like > Gmail would be ideal. > sure you can, f:noah,slate

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-20 Thread Noah Slater
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:51:51PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > | Mairix bothers me for a number of reasons. > > Can you elucidate some of these. Sure. I cannot search for multi-word strings such as "f:noah slater" but instead have to encode this as "f:noah f:slater". The whole syntax for spec

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Christian Ebert
* Cameron Simpson on Monday, July 06, 2009 at 17:05:34 +1000 > On 06Jul2009 05:52, Noah Slater wrote: >| I'm an enthusiastic mutt user, > > Me too, but I've never used Sup. > >| but Sup interests me for two reasons: >| * Thread centred message listing, > > How different from mutt's threads? >

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 06Jul2009 08:33, Noah Slater wrote: | On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:05:34PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: | > | but Sup interests me for two reasons: | > | * Thread centred message listing, | > | > How different from mutt's threads? | | It's probably best to just check out the Sup documentation

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Monday, July 6 at 11:18 AM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: I'd be thrilled if mutt gained one or two of Sup's searching features (personally, I like my idea for an interface: http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3031). For what it's worth, I did try to figure out how to do this myself, but I couldn't qui

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Monday, July 6 at 08:33 AM, quoth Noah Slater: It's probably best to just check out the Sup documentation: http://sup.rubyforge.org/ Those screenshots that might help illustrate some of the differences. Huh. I remember trying to use it once upon a time. Apparently my ruby install was i

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Noah Slater
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:05:34PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: > | but Sup interests me for two reasons: > | * Thread centred message listing, > > How different from mutt's threads? It's probably best to just check out the Sup documentation: http://sup.rubyforge.org/ Those screenshots that

Re: Features like Sup

2009-07-06 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 06Jul2009 05:52, Noah Slater wrote: | I'm an enthusiastic mutt user, Me too, but I've never used Sup. | but Sup interests me for two reasons: | * Thread centred message listing, How different from mutt's threads? | views, Search results as a folder? Mairix is the usually mutt approach fo

Features like Sup

2009-07-05 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, I'm an enthusiastic mutt user, but Sup interests me for two reasons: * Thread centred message listing, views, and tagging * Bulit-in, and advanced, search features It's a shame Sup's author didn't work with mutt to get these features working. Is the mutt development team interested in