On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:05:01PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:56:13PM +0200, Richard wrote:
> >If your solution can be done with my_hdr it might be best to
> >simply document how to do it?
>
> I'm not aware of how to do this with my_hdr. The Thread-Index header on
> the r
On 2011-05-28 14:22:10 -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> That might make sense in your environment, but in a corporate
> Microsoft-centric environment (an unfortunate reality), discarding
> Thread-Index would be akin disabling the ability to have Outlook thread
> emails. I've already gotten emails from my
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:56:13PM +0200, Richard wrote:
If your solution can be done with my_hdr it might be best to simply
document how to do it?
I'm not aware of how to do this with my_hdr. The Thread-Index header on
the reply must be calculated from the Thread-Index header of the parent
me
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:22:10PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
I am not against mutt having a capability but open source related mailing
lists should deliberately filter this and much more nonsense in the headers.
I am pretty familiar with making horrible hacks to make particular
features working for
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 06:38:47PM +0200, Richard wrote:
> I think mailing list admins should be encouraged to filter binary headers
> with undocumented content.. be it the mystery yahoo header or Thread-Index.
That might make sense in your environment, but in a corporate
Microsoft-centric enviro
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 05:53:23PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Can't we just teach Microsoft that they can look at In-Reply-To: and
> References: headers?
That would be wonderful. History says that's unlikely...
> What does Thunderbird do? Does it break Outlook 2010 threading, too?
I don't
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 05:01:20PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
> I can pull this off with some muttrc-hackery, though it's not exacly
> clean. I'd be willing to refresh my knowledge of the mutt sources and
> craft a patch to do this automatically (either 100% of the time based on
> the presence of Thr
Am 27.05.2011 23:01, schrieb Bob Bell:
>
> I can pull this off with some muttrc-hackery, though it's not exacly
> clean. I'd be willing to refresh my knowledge of the mutt sources and
> craft a patch to do this automatically (either 100% of the time based on
> the presence of Thread-Index, or if
Hi,
I understand your situation and your motivation quite well. I work in
an Outlook-centric corporation too.
> I've determined that Outlook disregards References and In-Reply-To
> headers, and instead relies on Thread-Topic and Thread-Index headers.
> Mutt doesn't preserve either of these headers
I'm now using mutt, at least some of the time, for my work email. This
involves accessing an Exchange server via IMAP. I'm the exception; most
people are using Outlook.
What I'm finding is that although all messages are threaded fine in
mutt, the replies that I send are not threaded in other pe
10 matches
Mail list logo
