Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-20 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 20 March 2007 at 19:32, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:47:55AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > Hm, can't think of anything. The conditional is fine with me, do you want > > > me to send another patch? > > > > That'd be great. > > Ok, attached is the fixed patch

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-20 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:47:55AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > Hm, can't think of anything. The conditional is fine with me, do you want > > me to send another patch? > > That'd be great. Ok, attached is the fixed patch. -- Miroslav Lichvar diff -r 5681216fa395 buffy.c --- a/buffy.c Mon M

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-20 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 20 March 2007 at 18:42, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:50:34AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > > this looks a little like it should be a conditional on > > > > option(CHECKMBOXSIZE). > > > > > > I think it's ok either way. Without the conditional it's a bit > >

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-20 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:50:34AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > this looks a little like it should be a conditional on > > > option(CHECKMBOXSIZE). > > > > I think it's ok either way. Without the conditional it's a bit > > closer to allowing runtime switching of the option and not losing > >

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-20 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 15 March 2007 at 10:23, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > On Thursday, 01 March 2007 at 16:23, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > > Ok, here is a patch that removes buffy_size completely and adds the > > > check_box_size option. > >

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-15 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Thursday, 01 March 2007 at 16:23, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > Ok, here is a patch that removes buffy_size completely and adds the > > check_box_size option. > > Looks nice, thanks. But... Thanks for looking into this. > > Index:

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-14 Thread Brendan Cully
On Thursday, 01 March 2007 at 16:23, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:33:17PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Miroslav Lichvar 2007-02-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > attached is a patch that makes the buffy size option configurable at > > > runtime. Mutt binary compiled with

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-03-01 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:33:17PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Miroslav Lichvar 2007-02-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > attached is a patch that makes the buffy size option configurable at > > runtime. Mutt binary compiled with --enable-buffy-size will > > have an extra boolean variable that cont

Re: [PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-02-28 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Miroslav Lichvar 2007-02-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > attached is a patch that makes the buffy size option configurable at > runtime. Mutt binary compiled with --enable-buffy-size will > have an extra boolean variable that controls if mbox size should be > used when checking for new mail. > +++ in

[PATCH] runtime configurable buffy size

2007-02-28 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
Hi, attached is a patch that makes the buffy size option configurable at runtime. Mutt binary compiled with --enable-buffy-size will have an extra boolean variable that controls if mbox size should be used when checking for new mail. Any chance this could be included? Thanks, -- Miroslav Lichv