Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date -+-- Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: build

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date -+-- Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: build

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date Comment (by Vincent Lefevre): {{{ On 2008-05-30 14:17:31 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Well, the best thing I can come up with so far is: > > hg log -r `hg id | cut -d' ' -f1` --template '{date|shortdate}' > > though I wonde

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

On 2008-05-30 14:17:31 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Well, the best thing I can come up with so far is: > > hg log -r `hg id | cut -d' ' -f1` --template '{date|shortdate}' > > though I wonder what implications this has when building from tarballs > (e.g. you unpack the tarball in some dir whose p

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date Comment (by Rocco Rutte): {{{ Hi, * Vincent Lefevre wrote: >On 2008-05-29 11:01:15 -, Mutt wrote: >> In general I think this is right. However, this breaks if you're >> not compiling tip (e.g. checked out some tag or

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

Hi, * Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2008-05-29 11:01:15 -, Mutt wrote: In general I think this is right. However, this breaks if you're not compiling tip (e.g. checked out some tag or specific revision, or in the middle of bisect). OTOH it's kind of an edge case and the question is whethe

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date Comment (by Vincent Lefevre): {{{ On 2008-05-29 11:01:15 -, Mutt wrote: > In general I think this is right. However, this breaks if you're > not compiling tip (e.g. checked out some tag or specific revision, > or in the

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

On 2008-05-29 11:01:15 -, Mutt wrote: > In general I think this is right. However, this breaks if you're > not compiling tip (e.g. checked out some tag or specific revision, > or in the middle of bisect). OTOH it's kind of an edge case and the > question is whether people actually do instal

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date Comment (by pdmef): In general I think this is right. However, this breaks if you're not compiling tip (e.g. checked out some tag or specific revision, or in the middle of bisect). OTOH it's kind of an edge case and the question

Re: [Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date Changes (by vinc17): * component: mutt => build Comment: Note about the patch: I've set the dependencies so that the reldate code is run everytime when typing "make" to make sure reldate.h is up-to-date. -- Ticket URL:

[Mutt] #2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date

#2889: version date is incorrect when ChangeLog is not up-to-date When the changelog file is not up-to-date, the version date (as output by "mutt -v") is incorrect. In practice, this is the case when one has a Mercurial working copy. So, a solution is to try "hg tip --template '{date|shortdate