Hello mutt developers,
here's a tiny patch to fix a minor logic error in thread.c, and a dead
code line.
Thanks for maintaining mutt,
Ralf
diff -r 033acdc0a947 thread.c
--- a/thread.c Mon Oct 11 07:56:47 2010 -0700
+++ b/thread.c Mon Oct 11 18:22:31 2010 +0200
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
{
static
Hi,
FYI a small typo.
Cheers,
Ralf
2008-07-03 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* protos.h (strtok_r): Fix syntax error.
diff -r f72fce68ca19 protos.h
--- a/protos.h Wed Jul 02 18:26:17 2008 +0200
+++ b/protos.h Thu Jul 03 20:23:34 2008 +0200
@@ -543,6 +543,6 @@ char *
Hello,
AFAICS since this change:
| 2007-12-11 15:22 +0100 Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (68a9c3e74f9a)
|
| * enter.c, history.h: Maintain different history lists for
| files and mailboxes. Closes #2999.
the following work flow is more difficult than it was before: save a
bu
* David Champion wrote on Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:49:11PM CEST:
> > Please don't use 'test -a'.
>
> I don't know why not, but whatever. I just want the problem fixed.
Not a big issue, but not totally portable.
> > Also, what when SunOS 5.12 comes out?
> > Wouldn't a check such as
> > AC_CHECK
Hello David,
* David Champion wrote on Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:33:45PM CEST:
> --- a/configure.acThu Apr 03 17:08:13 2008 +0200
> +++ b/configure.acWed Apr 23 12:33:27 2008 -0500
> @@ -1082,6 +1082,9 @@
>AC_MSG_ERROR([IDN requested but iconv is disabled or unavailable])
> fi
>
Hello Rocco,
* Rocco Rutte wrote on Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 03:35:28PM CET:
>
> the following two patches aim to make mutt builds/tarball builds working
> with a read-only source. The only problems were comming from below po/
[...]
Have you tried just using the infrastructure from a newer gettext
r
* Kyle Wheeler wrote on Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:27:10PM CEST:
> On Thursday, May 24 at 08:24 AM, quoth Ralf Wildenhues:
>>
>> save_IFS=$IFS
[...]
> No, that won't work, because when $IFS is expanded, it will become this:
>
> save_IFS=
No, it will work: The shell
* Cameron Simpson wrote on Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:31:31AM CEST:
> On 23May2007 13:33, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> | {
> | echo $PATH | tr : '\012' | while read dir; do
>
> This is more robustly written:
>
> printf "%s\n" "$PATH" | tr : '\012' | while read -r dir; do
An
