Re: the mutt development vacuum

2013-04-15 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:59:37PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > I more or less agree... the 1.5.x line IMO basically IS the defacto > stable branch now: Indeed! > But, if you want to stick with the "odd is devel, even is stable" scheme, So I would ignore special significance of version%2... P

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add compiler and configure info to mutt -v output

2012-10-18 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:57:52PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > Does anyone else think this is problematic? I could redo it in C if > it's a widespread concern. As you're offering, I think that would be preferable :-) Cheers, Patrick

Re: [Mutt] #3410: Mutt crashes when two instances open the same mailbox

2010-08-06 Thread Patrick Welche
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:37:40AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 03.08.2010, 14:51 Uhr, schrieb Mutt: > > >#3410: Mutt crashes when two instances open the same mailbox > >+--- > > Reporter: vext01 | Owner: me > >

Re: Unable to open mailbox

2009-11-13 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:55:00AM +, Patrick Welche wrote: > Using a very recent -HEAD mutt, and a cyrus server, I suddenly can't open a > very large INBOX. Essentially: > > [2009-11-10 11:19:13] 4< * 233696 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 733819 > INTERNALDATE "

Unable to open mailbox

2009-11-10 Thread Patrick Welche
Using a very recent -HEAD mutt, and a cyrus server, I suddenly can't open a very large INBOX. Essentially: [2009-11-10 11:19:13] 4< * 233696 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 733819 INTERNALDATE " 5-Nov-2009 10:16:07 +" RFC822.SIZE 7428 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJE CT TO CC MESSAGE-ID REFEREN

Re: ssl trouble

2009-10-04 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 06:17:02PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote: > I found I needed the attached patch when trying to compile on NetBSD shipping > with OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev 10 Jul 2009. (STACK not defined) > > Cheers, > > Patrick > diff -r 5037c59a589e mutt_ssl.c > --- a/mu

ssl trouble

2009-09-28 Thread Patrick Welche
I found I needed the attached patch when trying to compile on NetBSD shipping with OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev 10 Jul 2009. (STACK not defined) Cheers, Patrick diff -r 5037c59a589e mutt_ssl.c --- a/mutt_ssl.cTue Sep 22 23:29:11 2009 -0700 +++ b/mutt_ssl.cMon Sep 28 18:15:16 2009 +0100 @@ -6

Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] Drop mkinstalldirs, use install-sh -d instead

2009-07-08 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > it's implicit called through AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, so no explicit > reference there. Try autoconf --trace=AC_PROG_MKDIR_P to see where > it comes from :-) Nice to learn :-) > Perhaps we should shelve this part and rather make sure tha

Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] Drop mkinstalldirs, use install-sh -d instead

2009-07-08 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:48:07PM -, Matthias Andree wrote: > Drop mkinstalldirs, use install-sh -d instead. > > This requires that we use autoconf 2.60 and automake 1.10 or newer to > avoid race conditions in older versions of mkinstalldirs and install-sh. I totally agree on using $(MKDIR_P

Re: imap recent

2009-06-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:45:44AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Thursday, June 11 at 01:38 PM, quoth Patrick Welche: > >I don't use the header cache - I would have to enable it to use it > >right? > >(off by default?) > > Ahhh, I assumed that you did use it. Y

Re: imap recent

2009-06-11 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 02:49:45PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, June 8 at 12:21 PM, quoth Patrick Welche: > >Now I'm even more confused: mutt says after several days of not > >reading mail, mutt says: > > > >Msgs:220272 New:6 Old:710 > > >

Re: imap recent

2009-06-08 Thread Patrick Welche
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:32:09AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, June 1 at 10:27 PM, quoth Patrick Welche: > >So the first question is, am I missing a new setting in mutt? > > No - mutt's current behavior uses both \Unseen and \Recent along with > its own head

imap recent

2009-06-01 Thread Patrick Welche
Just trying today's mutt-head against a cyrus imap server. The only messages marked N are the ones which arrived while the inbox was open in mutt, not the ones which arrived since the inbox was last opened. [I think I used to have set imap_recent=yes, but now I see that imap_recent no longer exist

Re: imap mailbox browser

2008-10-22 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:34:22PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Monday, 20 October 2008 at 19:13, Patrick Welche wrote: > > I just updated to today's head (grabbing the #3000 patch, thanks!) and find > > that my list of mailboxes is now just "INBOX" (on cyrus ima

imap mailbox browser

2008-10-20 Thread Patrick Welche
I just updated to today's head (grabbing the #3000 patch, thanks!) and find that my list of mailboxes is now just "INBOX" (on cyrus imap server, / ) I set mask="" just in case, but no change. I note that imap_fix_path changed since the last version which worked for me. Cheers, Patrick

imap and large mailboxes

2008-10-13 Thread Patrick Welche
I am trying to open INBOX with 190,000 messages, tag around 8000, and tagged-copy them to another folder (http). Without the patch in #3000, mutt(-hg head) and the cyrus imap server end up stuck both trying to read, because write() wrote fewer bytes than mutt expected in one go. At this point, one