On 2014-09-11, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2014-09-11, Óscar Pereira wrote:
>
> > I should mention in passing that from what I've seen so far, I'm not
> > fond of mutt's coding style either: to me at least it makes code
> > harder to read.
>
> I thin
On 2014-09-11, Óscar Pereira wrote:
> I should mention in passing that from what I've seen so far, I'm not
> fond of mutt's coding style either: to me at least it makes code
> harder to read.
I think that's just a matter of taste and what your used to. Mutt's
coding style is essentially the same
On 2013-11-04, jpacner wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> you're entirely right with my misuse of 'high-quality'. I should have
> quoted it. The submitter himself would be responsible for the quality.
> The point of this suggestion is that patches would be incorporated
> faster, but on the other hand they co
On 2013-04-16, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013 at 03:23 PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> >Charles wrote that changing the file extension avoids having to
> >rewrite a _file_, not a file _name_.
>
> Understood. My point is that I don't see how having an extra four
>
On 2013-04-16, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013 at 01:44 PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> >Not difficult. The trouble is that it violates the maildir specification;
> >message filenames have a defined format, and ending with ".eml" breaks that
> >format, which as you noticed, is used for storin
On 2012-11-30, Andras Salamon wrote:
> A message consisting of the single line
> test
> (with one space at the start of the line) will become
> test
> when postponed. This can be verified by checking the postponed mail
> folder with a text editor. This can be repeated: each postpone adds
> a s
On 2010-10-12, Mutt wrote:
> #3460: view-attachments menu "view-attach" command uses auto_view for all text
> attachments, even when a suitable interactive command is in the mailcap
> file. This is particularly bad for text/html attachments.
> --
On 2010-06-16, Mutt wrote:
> #3422: Do not remove temporary files when viewing attachments
> ---+
> Reporter: madduck| Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: enhancement
On 2010-04-02, Mutt wrote:
> #3391: g key feedback the same as r
> -+--
> Reporter: jidanni | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: trivial | Milestone:
> Componen
On 2010-03-27, Mutt wrote:
> #3395: save-hook filename parameter in config file is misinterpreted
> --+-
> Reporter: daniell | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: defect|
On 2010-03-11, Mutt wrote:
> #3391: g key feedback the same as r
> -+--
> Reporter: jidanni | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: trivial | Milestone:
> Componen
On 2010-03-11, Mutt wrote:
> #3391: g key feedback the same as r
> -+--
> Reporter: jidanni | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: trivial | Milestone:
> Componen
On 2009-11-19, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:00:54AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2009-11-19, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> > > please consider this patch that adds a boolean configuration option,
> > > reply_prefix. When turned off, the "R
On 2009-11-19, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please consider this patch that adds a boolean configuration option,
> reply_prefix. When turned off, the "Re: " prefix will not be added to
> the subject of a reply, unless the subject was empty.
As someone pointed out in another thread, maybe in
On 2009-05-13, Mutt wrote:
> #3225: new mail notifications are lost too easily
> -+--
> Reporter: vinc17 | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Priority: minor| Miles
On 2009-03-31, Mutt wrote:
> Some of my mailcap entries are quite long. They show up in the mutt pager
> like this:
>
> [-- Autoview using w3m -cols 70 -o frame=1 -o graphic_char=1 -o
> ignore_null_img_alt=1 -o color=0 -o follow_locale=1 -dump
> file://'/tmp/mutt.html' --]
>
> I'd really
I just tried compiling mutt-1.5.19 under Cygwin 1.5.25-15. Configure
completes successfully and says, in part,
checking wchar.h usability... yes
checking wchar.h presence... yes
checking for wchar.h... yes
checking for wchar_t... yes
but make errors with these messages at the ld
In the thread, "Segmentation fault from mutt-1.5.17 with SMTP," I
wrote that when using mutt's built-in SMTP client to send messages
in batch mode, mutt printed the following messages:
Looking up mailsvr.spk.agilent.com...
Connecting to mailsvr.spk.agilent.com...
Sending message... 0K/0
On 2008-11-12, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Wed Nov 12 2008 Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > worked fine until I added a particular term to the 'reply_regex'
> > expression. That term contained some non-ASCII characters that have
>
On 2008-11-12, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-11-11, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you're going to the trouble of hacking on the source anyway, I'd
> > suggest you use 1.5.18 or the latest from mercurial.
>
>
On 2008-11-11, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 11 at 12:18 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
>> Is this a known problem or should I investigate further?
>
> Are you using mutt's internal regex engine? Try recompiling mutt with the
> --with-regex o
On 2008-11-11, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're going to the trouble of hacking on the source anyway, I'd
> suggest you use 1.5.18 or the latest from mercurial.
You're right--I really should have done that.
Today I downloaded, built and installed mercurial. Then I used
merc
On 2008-11-11, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2008 at 08:55, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2008-11-10, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Monday, November 10 at 12:15 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
> > >> $ echo tes
On 2008-11-11, Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:55:06AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > I tried the following three methods of specifying my from address.
>
> > 1.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo test | mutt -s test garyjohn
>
Until recently I had been using mutt-1.5.17 on Solaris. Now I'm
using the same version on Linux. I just noticed that reply_regex is
not working correctly on the Linux version. If I open $MAIL on
Solaris, execute ":reset reply_regex", and reply to a message with
the Subject
RE: Progress
On 2008-11-10, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2008 at 09:01, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Monday, November 10 at 11:42 PM, quoth TAKAHASHI Tamotsu:
> >> This has already been fixed:
> >>
> >> 1970-01-01 00:00 + Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (a2e8f6fab8d3)
On 2008-11-10, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, November 10 at 12:15 AM, quoth Gary Johnson:
>> $ echo test | mutt -s test garyjohn
>
> Hmmm, okay, so, you're not *specifying* a return address. I suppose the
> question is: what should mutt be doi
I haven't had time to make much progress on this, but I thought I'd
present what I've found so far in case someone else might have found
the same thing.
I've used mutt for years on Unix systems with sendmail. Now I'm
having to use a system without a properly configured sendmail so I'm
trying
On 2008-08-07, Moritz Barsnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the attached lines in my ~/.mailcap to use w3m as an HTML viewer.
> I also have another entry (earlier within mailcap, not attached here)
> which tests for a display and starts w3m in a separate xterm.
>
> One rule "dump"s the rend
On 2008-03-03, Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rado S wrote: [Mon Mar 03 2008, 06:50:41AM EST]
> > Gary's solution is probably closer to what you expect(ed), but mine
> > has no magic with it: I simply define all my MLs as "ml-..." alias
> > and hit 'm' as usual to start a new msg.
>
>
On 2008-03-03, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-02 15:04:27 +, N.J. Mann wrote:
>
> >> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender
> >> of the currently selected message. In addition, I think I
> >> updated The Manual correctly.
>
> > Great idea.
>
On 2008-03-03, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:30:42PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> > On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > > > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:
On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rado S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> > > On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to li
On 2008-02-28, Brian Medley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a patch that starts a new message to the sender of
> the currently selected message. In addition, I think I updated
> The Manual correctly.
>
> Suggestions/Thoughts/Criticism are welcome.
Terrific! I've wanted this
On 2008-02-03, Mun Johl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Sorry, I didn't provide a sufficient subject on the original post.)
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to highlight a mulit-line regex in the
> body of a message? I am trying to use "color body ..." to highlight a
> multi-line desc
On 2008-01-09, Bendany Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> When using charset hook , say
>
> charset-hook gb2312 gbk
>
> when mailcap reference the %{charset} variable, gb2312 is returned
> instead of gbk.
>
> I think mutt should return hook value instead of orginal value.
>
> am I tr
On 2007-12-21, Richard Patchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to run mutt on my SGI (see configuration options below).
> However when I submit the command, it just hangs. A ps -ef reveals that
> two processes are running. I have to issue a kill command to cancel the
> jobs.
> I sen
On 2007-12-19, Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to map CTRL-P/N to up/down in command-line mode?
I thought that was the default, then I realized that I've had these
in my muttrc for quite a while:
bind editor \cN history-down
bind editor \cP
patch also
improves the consistency of error reporting in that function.
The patch was made to mutt-1.5.16.
Regards,
Gary
- Forwarded message from Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: changing the subject line of a thread
Date: Wed
On 2007-06-26, Mutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #2924: mutt shows less pager index lines than configured
>
> I have the following line in my .muttrc
> {{{
> set pager_index_lines = 5
> }}}
> Mutt only shows 4 index entries above the pager. See the attached
> screenshot of my mutt mailing li
On 2007-05-23, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Gary Johnson 2007-05-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've encountered a few issues with using this patch. None of these
> > are bugs, just areas where I think the behavior could be improved.
> > Th
On 2007-05-21, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-05-21, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've updated Anatoly's patch from 2005 that adds mouse tracking using
> > slang/ncurses to mutt. With "set mouse&
hing, but I
run mutt in an xterm window right alongside Firefox (dual-monitor
display) and with the mouse already in my hand from using Firefox,
it's just natural to want to click on any new message that arrives
in mutt.
Regards,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent T
IR="/home/garyjohn/src/SunOS/mutt-1.5.15/share/mutt"
SYSCONFDIR="/home/garyjohn/src/SunOS/mutt-1.5.15/etc"
EXECSHELL="/bin/sh"
-MIXMASTER
To contact the developers, please mail to .
To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/.
patch-1.5.5.1.gj.sigontop_spa
er command, so I don't
understand the utility of a new function.
As for the benefit to new users, I think new users would benefit
from not having yet another means to change folders/mailboxes.
Regards,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mobile Broadband Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA
45 matches
Mail list logo
