On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:22:24PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:56:13AM +0300,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > In my opinion `hostname` in the kernel is just
> > a hint.
>
> Well, I mean seriously, if you're going to tell
> me tha
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:19:11PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:01:05PM -0700,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > You have several hostnames or A records or
> > domain names or whatever. Then you have
> > `hostname`, which is configured in kernel, at
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:15:02PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> The patch is ideal, where the ideal which it
> conforms to must be that it programmatically
> determines the domain of the machine correctly
> in all circumstances where that is possible, and
> NEVER produces a result which is invalid
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:20:15AM -0700,
Alexander Gattin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:15:26PM -0500, Derek
> Martin wrote:
> > parsing /etc/resolv.conf directly can be wrong,
No solution is ideal here.
You've added a lot of comments to trac ticket
3298. There'
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:30:09PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> > My system has several IP addresses and several
> > hostnames (depending on interface/network).
>
> Wrong, it has exactly one hostname, as does
> every TCP/IP-networked host. It may have
> several domain names corresponding to the
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:15:26PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 11:01:20AM -0700,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:06:35PM -0500, Derek
> > Martin wrote:
> > On the other hand, your patch breaks some of
> > setups th
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:06:35PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> Even if the patch was complete garbage, the
> point is there was never any discussion from the
> devs as to WHY. It was completely ignored for
> three and a half years.
Yes, ignoring your patch because of
technical/stylistic problems
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 07:53:11PM +0200, Petr
Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:22:00AM +0300,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > I use / ~b for searching in IMAP
> > folder. Newer IMAP versions support
> > server-side searching but AFAIK mutt doesn't
> > s
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:16:19PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> What, you want a counter example?
Yes,
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3298
This one is a miss.
> - Had a working patch 4 years ago.
I don't like some parts of your original patch
too, by the way. mutt is not an MTA but MUA
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:46:07AM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:22:00AM +0300,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > I use / ~b for searching in IMAP folder.
>
> Yeah, but what if you have 50 folders, and you
> don't know which one the message
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:03:44AM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:04:46PM +0300,
> Alexander Gattin wrote:
> > The "old" design you talk about comes from UNIX
> > concepts which power all the iThings, Androids and
> > Kindles you mo
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:58:25AM -0500, David
Champion wrote:
> Lacking a regular contibutor who expresses
> interest in joining the leadership team, it's
> premature to discuss a handoff of project
> leadership.
That pretty much closes the discussion ATM.
--
With best regards,
xrgtn
signatu
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:14PM -0500, Derek
Martin wrote:
> and has been for a very long time now. And THAT
> completely ignores the idea that Mutt's design
> is over 15 years old, and its design philosophy
> is much, much older. Mutt, and its user base
> (or at least a substantial segment of
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 06:57:46PM -0600, Derek
Martin wrote:
> Python has regex too of course, and it's only
> slightly harder to use than Perl's.
Python regexps are more cumbersome to use than
Perl's. For example, to check that pattern matches
and 1st group modulo 3 is 0:
> print "$1 ==
14 matches
Mail list logo
