[Mutt] #3879: mutt: encoded-words are not decoded in mailto:

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3879: mutt: encoded-words are not decoded in mailto: ---+-- Reporter: antonio@… | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: charset|Version: 1.7.0 Keywords: | ---

Re: [PATCH] Adds capability to edit x-labels inside mutt, and to sort by label

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:01:19PM -0700, d...@bikeshed.us wrote: > Adds capability to edit x-labels inside mutt, and to sort by label. Hi David, I have comments interleaved below. I haven't applied and actually tested the patch (being quite confident that you and others have probably been using

Re: [Mutt] #3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails -+- Reporter: uxmutt | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: maildir/mh |Version: Resolution: | Ke

Re: [Mutt] #3798: Unexpected inbox sorting order

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3798: Unexpected inbox sorting order --+-- Reporter: mikejsavage | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: trivial | Milestone: Component: mutt |Version: Resolution: fixed| Key

Re: [Mutt] #3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails -+- Reporter: uxmutt | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: maildir/mh |Version: Resolution: fixed |

mutt: 2 new changesets

2016-09-25 Thread Brendan Cully
changeset: 6800:586dad383893 user: Kevin McCarthy date: Sun Sep 25 13:11:03 2016 -0700 link: http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/586dad383893 Reset invalid parsed received dates to 0. (closes #3878) The actual problem in the ticket would be solved by d3f31cf9239e (see #3798). Howeve

Re: [Mutt] #3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails -+- Reporter: uxmutt | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: maildir/mh |Version: Resolution: | Ke

Re: [Mutt] #3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails -+- Reporter: uxmutt | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: maildir/mh |Version: Resolution: | Ke

[Mutt] #3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails

2016-09-25 Thread Mutt
#3878: mtime to -1 for about 1% of the mails -+-- Reporter: uxmutt | Owner: mutt-dev Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: maildir/mh |Version: Keywords: utime mtime | ---

Re: [PATCH] Abstract the SPAM_LIST as a generic REPLACE_LIST

2016-09-25 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 04:13:19PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > The first is general. Mutt uses fixed size buffers for a lot of things, > but I think this might be one of the cases where we don't want to use a > LONG_STRING fixed length buffer. I realize this makes the > implementation even