#3866: interrupting mutt operations
+--
Reporter: antonio@… | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: mutt |Version: 1.7.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
---
#3866: interrupting mutt operations
+--
Reporter: antonio@… | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: mutt |Version: 1.7.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
---
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:36:12PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:07:18PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> I need to think about this. I'm nervous about this approach, because
> I'm not convinced all the possible string truncations are of sufficient
> severity to warrant
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:39:18PM -0400, Damien Riegel wrote:
> Quick question, mutt has snprintf.c which implements snprintf and
> vsnprintf. Now that mutt requires a C99 compiler, is this file (and
> checks in configure) still needed?
Probably not. I'm not really in a hurry to rip it out, thou
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:07:18PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> The abort on failure is annoying, but better than a potential security
> hole caused by silently truncating sensitive data, and the abort
> mostly shouldn't ever happen.
I need to think about this. I'm nervous about this approach, be
Kevin J. McCarthy writes:
[...]
> > The question is, does it make sense to add them to more than just
> > index and pager maps. I don't feel that strongly about it.
>
> This is more complicated than it sounds, as we'd have to handle changing
> mailboxes in places where this might not make sense.
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 07:07:18PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:32:40AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > Is strfcpy() widely available?
>
> Ah, now I see that strfcpy() is a Mutt-specific macro that intends to
> make strncpy() safer. I was actually thinking of strlcpy()
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:10:36PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-09-05 19:07:18 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:32:40AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > Is strfcpy() widely available?
> >
> > Ah, now I see that strfcpy() is a Mutt-specific macro that intends t
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:26:15PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Unfortunately px is underspecified.
What do you mean?
>> Perhaps it would be beneficial to add
>>
>>
>>
>> to `mutt.xsl` to ask a browser to use an "ideal" viewport of the
>> device.
> But then, it seems that you may have prob
On 2016-09-06 06:21:18 +0300, Alexander Gromnitsky wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 06:04:59PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 05:09:46AM +0300, Alexander Gromnitsky wrote:
> >> -body { margin-left:2%; margin-right:2%; font-family:serif; }
> >> +@media (min-width: 768px) {
>
On 2016-09-05 19:07:18 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:32:40AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > Is strfcpy() widely available?
>
> Ah, now I see that strfcpy() is a Mutt-specific macro that intends to
> make strncpy() safer. I was actually thinking of strlcpy(), which is
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
