Hi David,
David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> I have not tried to modify the default algorithm yet (no time today
> other than the initial patch and install), however I have used the patch
> to sign emails to myself and others and compared the claimed algorithm
> used. Without the patch today's tip sho
* Kevin J. McCarthy [2015-07-12 19:20 -0400]:
This patch came from a bug report on IRC from "ep". He noticed Mutt
was hardcoding the micalg parameter to sha1, but his actual signature
digest was using sha256. Because of this, Thunderbird was rejecting
the signature.
Ok.
Another possibility
Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> David Champion wrote:
> > Does the attached patch work on BSD? (Please save to patch, don't use
> > copy/paste.)
After spending the afternoon trying to figure out kvm, I was able to
install FreeBSD, confirm the reported bugs, and test both patches.
The sed patch alone
* On 06 Aug 2015, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> Of course this does not explain why Thunderbird works. Maybe my dignostics is
> wrong and the message comes from different piece of software and has different
> cause. Or Thunderbird uses different encryption so NSA does not try. Or
> Thunderbird silently r
