Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Ah. I see my mistake. I didn't realize mutt was prompting for the
> label first. The current patch added a prompt for *each* certificate
> leaf+chain, but that won't work. I will change it to prompt only once
> for the whole thing.
Here's a revised patch loosening up
Hi David,
Thanks for testing my patch so quickly.
David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> It does handle all the certificates, but does not end up using the label
> entered in mutt for all the certificates, nor does it allow the user to
> enter labels for the certificates individually when used from within
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2015-05-23 13:52
-0400]:
Second, the request: For some reason the patch results in the
intermediate *and* root certificates ending up in the file in which the
intermediate certificate should be placed.
In this context "the patch" refers to my patch on top of your patch
* Kevin J. McCarthy [2015-05-22 17:21 -0400]:
Attached is a patch which hopefully implements better certificate chain
handling for add_cert. Although I've tried to test it, I am not a
S/MIME user and don't have access to a large number of certificates to
play with. I would greatly appreciate i
